What number multiplied by itself 2 times equals 1/100

In 1980, the number of African elephants was 1,200,000 but that number was decreasing 5.25% a year.

algol13

<span>Answer is about 12.85.</span>

3 0

3 years ago

ᕼEᒪᑭ ᗩᔕᗩᑭ <br> TᕼE ᗷEᔕT E᙭ᑭᒪᗩIᑎEᗪ ᗩᑎᔕᗯEᖇ ᗯIᒪᒪ GET ᑕᖇOᗯᑎ

olga nikolaevna [1]

Answer: Idk if this is right but the answer is 21.2, Each time you add 4.8cm

Step-by-step explanation: 4 cups=11.6cm

11.6cm+4.8cm=16.4cm

16.4cm+4.8cm=21.2

6 0

3 years ago

50 POINTS IF ANSWERED, BRAINLIEST IF EXPLAINED

puteri [66]

M=change in y/change in x
Finding gradient of the orginal line
=3+1/0-3
=-4/3
Since parallel lines are equal the other line would be -4/3 (gradient)
Sub (-3;2) into y=mx+c
2=-4/3 (-3)+c
2=4+5
2-4=c
-2 = c

Therefore sub all your info and you get y= -4/3x-2

6 0

3 years ago

A teacher has 3 hours to grade all the papers submitted by the 35 students in her class. She gets through the first 5 papers in

Andreyy89

So, she has 3hrs to grade all papers, for 35 students.. alrite.

the first 5, she does them in 30minutes.. what's the speed rate? well, 5/30 or 1/6

now, she has still 2 hours and a half, or 150 minutes, to do the remaining 30 papers... she has to work at a rate of 30/150 then... which is 1/5 simplified.

now if we take 1/6 as the 100%, what is 1/5 in percentage then?

$\bf \begin{array}{ccllll}
rate&\%\\
\text{\textemdash\textemdash\textemdash}&\text{\textemdash\textemdash\textemdash}\\
\frac{1}{6}&100\\\\
\frac{1}{5}&x
\end{array}\implies \cfrac{\frac{1}{6}}{\frac{1}{5}}=\cfrac{100}{x}\implies \cfrac{1}{6}\cdot \cfrac{5}{1}=\cfrac{100}{x}\implies \cfrac{5}{6}=\cfrac{100}{x}
\\\\\\
x=\cfrac{6\cdot 100}{5}\implies x=120$

so 1/5 is 120% in relation to 1/6... meaning the rate of 1/5 she needs to move through, namely 1 paper every 5 minutes, is 20% faster than 1/6.

8 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

A group of students was discussing the meaning of this statement. They were arguing back and forward about whether the converse

Savatey [412]

Answer:

The statement is missing. The statement is -- "A ray can be part of a line."

The answer is : The converse is not true, so Jahmiah is correct.

Step-by-step explanation:

A conditional statement is represented by showing p → q. It means if p is correct or true, then q is also correct or true.

And the converse of p → q can be shown as q → p.

But we know that the converse of a statement is not always true, it may be true and may not be true.

In the context, the statement is " a ray can be a part of a line." And so the converse would be "A line can be a part of the ray".

So by definition we know that a line is continuous line having no end points, it extends in one direction. While a ray starts from a point and extends to infinity in one direction.

Thus ray is part of line but line is not a part of the ray. So the converse of the statement is not correct.

Hence, Jahmiah is correct.

6 0

3 years ago