1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Daniel [21]
3 years ago
8

I just need the (volume) to this shape Help please !!

Mathematics
1 answer:
maks197457 [2]3 years ago
7 0
The answer is 14. Hope this helped
You might be interested in
Solve for x, given the equation Square root of x-5+7=11
denis-greek [22]

\sqrt{x-5+7} = 11\\x-5+7 = 11^2\\x-5+7 = 121\\x + 2 = 121\\x = 119

Check the answer:

\sqrt{119-5+7} \\\sqrt{114+7} \\\sqrt{121} \\11

This answer is correct,

x = 119

6 0
3 years ago
1. Given a right circular conea) What is the shape of a cross section parallel to the base of the cone?b) what is the shape of a
AlekseyPX

Given:

There are given the statement, shape of the cross-section that is parallel to the base of the cone.

Explanation:

If the base of the cone that parallels to tye cross-section.

So,

The shape of the cross-section is

8 0
1 year ago
Solve the equation. <br><img src="https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%20%7Cx%20-%20%20%5Cfrac%7B4%7D%7B3%7D%20%7C%20%20%3D%20%20%7Cx%20%2B%
lisov135 [29]
X=7/12 is the awnser
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Chen writes down a two digit number. He finds out that if he swapped the numbers, it would be three more than the 1/3 of the ori
inna [77]

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

From the information given,

Let the two digits that Chen writes down to be p and q

where,

q will be in the unit place and p will be in the tens place.

So, the value of the digit = 10p + q

So, if he swapped the number, he will have 10q + p

However,

the new number determined is thrice more than the 1/3 pf the original number.

i.e

the 1/3rd of the original number = \dfrac{1}{3}(10p+q)

=\dfrac{10p+q}{3}

thrice more than that will be = \dfrac{10p+q}{3} + 3

∴

\dfrac{10p+q}{3} + 3 = 10q+p

multiply through by 3, we have :

10p+q + 9 = 30q + 3p

collecting the like terms, we have:

10p - 3p +q -30q +9 = 0

7p - 29q +9 = 0

7p - 29q = -9

Therefore, p,q lie between 0 and 9

Therefore, the possibility of the original number is p = 7 and q = 2

8 0
4 years ago
Can someone please help me with this question?!? I am so confused and I don't know how to answer it.
lbvjy [14]

9514 1404 393

Answer:

  a. f(0) = 1

  b. DNE (does not exist)

  c. DNE

  d. lim = 3

Step-by-step explanation:

The function exists at a point if it is defined there. The function is defined anywhere on the solid line and at solid dots. It is not defined at open circles. So, the function is defined everywhere except (2, 3), which has an open circle.

The open circle at (0, 4) prevents the function from being doubly-defined at x=0, since it is already defined to be 1 at x=0.

This discussion tells you ...

  f(0) = 1

 f(2) does not exist. There is a "hole" in the function definition there.

__

The function has a limit at a point if approaching from the left and approaching from the right have you approaching that same point.

Consider the point (1, 2). The graph is a solid line through that point. Approaching from values less than x=1, we get to the same point (1, 2) as when we approach from values greater than x=1.

Similarly, consider the point (2, 3). Approaching from values of x less than 2, we get to the same point (2, 3) as when we approach from x-values greater than 2. The limit at x=2 is 3. The only difference from the previous case is that the function is not actually defined to be that value there.

__

Now consider what happens at x=0. When we approach from the left, we approach the point (0, 4). When we approach from the right, we approach the point (0, 1). These are different points. Because they are different coming from the left and from the right, we say "the limit as x→0 does not exist."

__

In summary, ...

  a) f(0) = 1

  b) lim x → 0 does not exist

  c) f(2) does not exist

  d) lim x → 2 = 3

_____

<em>Additional comment</em>

The significance of the function not being defined at a point where the limit exists, (2, 3), is that <em>the function is not continuous there</em>. This kind of discontinuity is called "removable", because we could make the function continuous at x=2 by defining f(2) = 3 (that is, "filling the hole").

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What is 1.62 in a fraction
    5·2 answers
  • The amount of fat, in grams, in granola is proportional to the volume, in cups, of the granola as shown on graph.
    12·2 answers
  • Consider the algebraic expression 3x + 4.State the following
    15·2 answers
  • David and his two friends
    13·1 answer
  • Write a polynomial equation of degree 3 such that two of its roots are 2 and an imaginary number.
    7·2 answers
  • Here’s another one 4/5-(-2/3)
    5·2 answers
  • What should be added to 7777 to get 4999<br>​
    15·1 answer
  • Please help meeeee!!! Will give 25 points and brainlest!!
    7·1 answer
  • PLEASE HELP ME! THANK YOU!!
    10·1 answer
  • If 15 baseballs cost $9 how much would 30 cost
    12·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!