Answer:
The options include:
[A] cannot implement the plan
<em>[B] can implement the plan
</em>
[C] can implement the plan only if no commissions are charged
[D] can implement the plan only if no management fee is charged
<em>[B] can implement the plan is Correct</em>
Explanation:
Because the client or consumer has been fully disclosed and he agrees that the Adviser / Representative will obtain a management fee and commissions the Advisor / Representative will be allowed to progress with the project.
Answer:
equity:
-He cuts the pie into eight equal slices.
-He cuts the pie into many slices so that everyone gets a piece.
Efficiency:
-He lets one person eat the whole pie.
-He makes sure that the whole pie is eaten.
Explanation:
Equity deals with distribution i.e to ensure things are equally distributed
While
Efficiency is trying to make sure things are completely used up i.e act of preventing waste
Answer:
If a statute is silent on this point, enforcement depends on whether it is a(n) REGULATORY statute or a revenue-raising statute.
Explanation:
Regulatory statutes regulate practitioners, e.g. doctors, constructors, real estate brokers, dentists, etc., and its main purpose is to protect the general public. This statues are state laws meant to regulate certain professions that may be considered sensitive or hazardous. E.g. a person that pretends to be a doctor can severely injure a patient or even kill him/her. A person that pretends to be a real estate broker can be committing fraud against his/her clients.
Answer:1. The reason that the varsity team lost to JV team is lack of working together as a team.
2.Coach P. when selecting the rowers for the two teams should have looked at both the psychological(personality types and traits, if they are leader or followers etc.) as well as the physical aspect ( Stamina, Speed ,Coordination, Strength etc.) of each individual.
explanation:
1:Even though the varsity team consisted of the best individuals for speed , strength, coordination and endurance, they lacked the cohesiveness to perform as a unit. Each of the eight individual rowers had to be single-mindedly attuned to one another in order to synchronize their rowing and perform in unison. Unfortunately, the team also too many disruptor and lacked a leader.
2:The Coach should have experimented more by creating different scenarios to see how well the individuals responded and performed to one another in different situations when it came to a team environment. For example, putting the rowers in total control of the team's dynamics is the best hands on lesson they could ever experience. This would have allowed the rowers a deeper understanding what it take to be winner from a loser.
3.Coach P. should switch both the teams for Tuesday since after extensive observations and evaluation he has witnessed JV work as a better team. The JV team possessed better synergy, synchronization, and shared a common goal causing them to win more frequently than the Varsity team, despite the fact that the Varsity team had better individual members. In addition, there has been a precedent for switching boats. During the mid-1990’s, the Cornell Coach faced asimilar situation as Coach P. and as a result of him making the switch, both the JV and Varsity teams ended up winning the Eastern Championships. This demonstrates that it is more likely thatthe teams will win if they agree to switch. Moreover, even if Coach P. decided not to switch the teams, it would have taken quite a while to rebuild Varsity’s team structure, morale, and overall team synergy, implying that they probably would not have been ready in time to compete and win the race as the Varsity team anyway.
