A machine would cost $142,000 and the depreciation of $98,000
Answer: A Contract was formed on February 5th
Explanation:
The contract was formed the very day that Bob mailed Ann his acceptance which was on the 5th of February.
Ann attempted to revoke the acceptance too late as she did it a day after he had emailed his acceptance even though she only received it on the 7th.
The date she received the acceptance is of no consequence because this falls under the Posting Rule. This rule in Common Law countries essentially states an agreement is made as soon as the letter is posted even if it never gets to it's destination.
Answer:
Common stock and $100
Explanation:
The journal entry is shown below:
Cash Dr $500 (100 shares × $5)
To Common stock $100 (100 shares × $1)
To Additional paid in capital in excess of par value - common stock (100 shares × $4)
(Being the issuance of the common stock is recorded)
For recording this we debited the cash as it increased the assets and credited the common stock and additional paid in capital as it increased the stockholder equity
Answer:
d. Is an acceptable strategy once a need has been identified and a suitable product has been selected.
Explanation:
A face to face selling of a product directly to business is one of the best example of personal selling e.g. cars, photocopier, office equipment etc.
Answer:
Explanation:
Solution-
According to Senator Jones, the elasticity of taxable income is larger, which means that due to a certain percentage rise in taxes, the taxable income rises by a greater percentage. Also, according to Senator Smith, the elasticity of taxable income is small, which means that due to a certain percentage rise in taxes, the taxable income rises by a smaller percentage.
(I) Under Senator Jones assumptions, due to rise in taxes, the taxable income has risen considerably as compared to Senator Smith assumptions. Thus the estimates of additional revenue from the tax increase will be larger under Senator Jones assumptions, compared to Smith's assumptions.
(ii) Since under Senator Jones assumptions, elasticity of taxable income is large. So due to rise in taxes, there is a significant proportional rise in taxable income under Jone's assumptions compared to Senator Smith assumptions. Thus the costs of the tax increase is borne more under Senator Jones assumptions , compared to Smith's assumptions.
