Missing information:
Corporation makes 5,700 units of part U13 each year. This part is used in one of the company's products. The company's Accounting Department reports the following costs of producing the part at this level of activity: Per Unit Direct materials $9.60 Direct labor $7.80 Variable manufacturing overhead $10.20 Supervisor's salary $5.90 Depreciation of special equipment $8.80 Allocated general overhead $8.00 An outside supplier has offered to make and sell the part to the company for $25.10 each.
Answer:
annual financial advantage of purchasing part from outside vendor = $73,380
Explanation:
current production costs per unit:
- direct materials $9.60
- direct labor $7.80
- variable manufacturing overhead $10.20
- supervisor's salary $5.90
- depreciation of special equipment $8.80
- allocated general overhead (fixed) $8.00
- total current costs per unit = $50.30
- total costs $50.30 x 5,700 units = $286,710
costs if company decides to purchase the part form outside vendor:
- purchase cost per unit $25.10
- deprecation of special equipment $8.80
- allocated general overhead $8.00
- total costs per unit = $41.90
- total costs $41.90 x 5,700 = $238,830
- - revenue generated from using facility space = $238,830 - $25,500 = $213,330
annual financial advantage of purchasing part from outside vendor = $286,710 - $213,330 = $73,380
Answer:
15.68%
Explanation:
Now to get the expected return of the portfolio, we need to find the return of the portfolio in each state of the economy. This portfolio is a special case since all three assets have the same weight. To find the expected return in an equally weighted portfolio, we can sum the returns of each asset and the we divide it by the number of assets, so the expected return of the portfolio in each state of the economy will be :
Boom: RP= (.13 + .21 + .39) / 3 = .2433, or 24.33%
Bust: RP= (.15 + .05 −.06) / 3 = .0467, or 4.67%
Now to get the expected return of the portfolio, we multiply the return in each state of the economy by the probability of that state occurring, and then sum. In so doing, we get
E(RP) = .56(.2433) + .44(.0467)
=.1568, or 15.68%
Answer: the ability to produce a good at a lower opportunity cost than other producers
Explanation: In other to clearly understand or grasp the definition or meaning of comparative advantage, the term opportunity cost should be understood. Opportunity cost simply means the benefit which one forfeits or losses when one chooses a certain option over the other. Comparative advantage is possessed by a certain seller or economy who is capable of selling his goods at a lower opportunity cost than its competitors. Thus, the comparative advantages weighs the size or amount of benefit forfeited or lost by sellers as a result of selling at a lower price. Thus the lower the opportunity cost, the better the comparative advantage.
owjsbsuensienusnwjhrudbehssyhe
The government can be used to solve externality problem that are to costly for parties to solve THE ANSWER IS TRUE
