Answer:
a. Yes. This provides convincing evidence that the true proportion of all attendees who ate the fish that got sick (80%) is more than the true proportion of all attendees who did not eat the fish that got sick.
b. The mistake here would have been the rejection of the Doctor's theory or hypothesis to the effect that more attendees who ate the fish got sick than those who did not eat the fish. This is a Type 1 error. A Type 1 error occurs when a null hypothesis is rejected when it is true. On the other hand, a Type II error occurs when the null hypothesis is accepted when it should be rejected. While a Type I error is equivalent to a false positive, a Type II error is equivalent to a false negative.
Step-by-step explanation:
Total number of attendees who ordered fish = 1,000
Sample size of the attendees who ate fish = 80
Number of attendees who ate the fish and got sick = 64 (80% or 64/80)
Sample size of attendees who did not eat fish = 60
Number of attendees who did not eat fish and got sick = 39 (65% or 39/60)
Answer:
n has no value.
There is no solution to this equation
Step-by-step explanation:
let n be the number
In pieces:
sum of the number and 1: (n + 1)
8 times the sum: 8(n + 1)
-7 times a number: -7n
sum of -7 times and...: -7n + 8(n + 1)
number minus 7: n - 7
the same as: =
All together:
-7n + 8(n + 1) = n - 7
-7n + 8(n+1)=n-7
-7n + 8n+8=n-7
0=-15
The range of set B is approximately the range of set A
Unfortunately, there is no way I can find the value of X and Y because there is no question for it.
You can either find the value of X and Y in the problem or make X and Y your own value if you need to find something that is equivalent.
I hope this helped.
