Answer:
-When a plaintiff attempts to gain "home-court advantage" by fling his lawsuit in a courthouse close to his place of business
Explanation:
Forum shopping is the act of filling a lawsuit in a courthouse in which the plaintiff believes is likely to provide the most favorable outcome.
Forum shopping is a practice that occurs when filling a lawsuit, therefore a defendant is not able to practice forum shopping.
It is fair to assume that a plaintiff's place of business is likely to provide him the most favorable outcome.
The approvals of the Senate, the House of Representatives, and the President is needed for a bill to become a law.
Hope this helps :)
Answer:
Over time, as trust territories attained independence, the size and workload of the Trusteeship Council was reduced. With the independence of Palau, formerly part of the Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands, in 1994, there presently are no trust territories, leaving the Trusteeship Council without responsibilities.
Thomas Jefferson thanks me later ok
Answer:
A.Relevant, but only if the crime that was committed involved the use of a blowtorch.
Explanation:
These are options for the question
A.Relevant, but only if the crime that was committed involved the use of a blowtorch.
B.Relevant, but only if the prosecution can prove that Charles Rogers and not his brother was the actual owner of the blowtorch.
C.Irrelevant, assuming the defendant can prove to the court in an offer of proof that his brother does in fact use the blowtorch for professional purposes.
D.Irrelevant, since it is not information that a person would want to know in deciding whether the defendant committed the crime.
From the question we are informed Charles Rogers who was accused of robbing a bank by breaking into the bank's vault after hours. The prosecution seeks to introduce evidence that a blowtorch was found in his garage. The defendant objects, pointing out that Rogers' brother, who shares the home with Rogers, is a professional pipe-fitter and uses the blowtorch every day for legitimate work. In this case The evidence is relevant, but only if the crime that was committed involved the use of a blowtorch. In a crime scene which is regarded as location that is been associated to the crime committed. In this scene physical evidence should be able to be provided so that investigation and persecution of those involving in the crime can be relevant and it will be easier for investigators as well as law enforcement
