Answer:
A. The government consisted of an assembly, a council, and courts.
C. Only free adult males made up the assembly.
D. The citizens elected leaders to discuss important matters.
E. Women, slaves, and foreigners were not allowed to participate.
Explanation:
Around 594 to 321 BC, in the Athenian polis, there was a democratic form of government. It is called the world's first democratic system. Any citizen had the right (and even the obligation) to participate in the work of the National Assembly. As it is noted by experts, in the heyday of Athenian democracy, about a third of citizens simultaneously held one or another public office.
Ancient Greek democracy was a limited democracy of only free citizens, leaving without the political rights slaves and women, who constituted the vast majority of the population; this ancient democracy was slave-owning democracy.
The national assembly met every 8-9 days, and several thousand people took part in it. Between the meetings of the ecclesia, the “council of five hundred,” was engaged in current affairs. Members of the council were elected by lot of citizens no younger than 30 years old. Litigation was heard in a "jury trial." It consisted of 6,000 people who were chosen by lot.
A group leader who allows complete freedom for discussions and decisions, but participates in neither is a <span>laissez faire leader.</span>
They knew hit and run attacks called guerrilla warfare
All of the above. Haiti is located near a major fault zone, half of its population at the time lived in densely populated urban areas; their weak government, which is a remnant of colonial impact, is very poor for the same reason and therefore did not have buildings up to code regarding earthquakes.
Not sure about poor soil but it probably didn't help if that is true. Islands aren't exactly famous for a lot of quality soil (large amount of sand which is unstable).
Answer: Dissenting Opinion
-----
Usually when decision is written, justices can write a concurring opinion if they would like to add something to the decision or if they agree with the decision, but disagrees with the reasoning. On the other hand, if they do not agree with the majority (aka the decision), they can write a dissenting opinion.
