I don’t see a question so how do I help
The onion model, which elaborates on social penetration as a process by which people "peel back" layers of personal knowledge about others through interpersonal interaction to reach the core, is a good metaphor for explaining how social penetration theory functions.
To learn about someone's "core self," or the most private aspects of that person takes time. The surface of a person that is visible to many others is their public image. The innermost parts of a person, known only to close relationships through disclosure over time, constitute the private self.
The surface, medium, inner, and core personality layers are only a few of the levels that are described by the social penetration hypothesis. Rather superficial information, like preferences for certain types of music and clothing, makes up the superficial layers. In computer-mediated communication contexts like online dating and virtual teams, the theory has also been applied.
To learn more about the social penetration theory:
brainly.com/question/13615011
#SPJ4
Answer:
To eliminate bias when they're making a decision.
Explanation:
Every individuals have our own preference. Including the people who work in a marketing team.
Often times, the preference that the members of marketing have can be different to the preference of their target market. What the marketing team think as a 'Good product' might not be seen as such by the customers.
Researches through objective method follows a rigid scientific process in order to find an answer to a certain question. The end result of such results will eliminate emotion or personal bias and only factors in all relevant factors that can actually be used as hard data.
This is why they conducted researchers through objective method to measure the market's perception toward their product.
Answer: This concept can be used to determine the acceptable level of risk, by placing the amount of risk in a given situation to balance against time, trouble, cost, and physical difficulty of taking precautions to avoid risk. If a balance is seen with risk against this variables, then the risk is acceptable.
The pitfall to applying this concept are as follows;
• it doesn't guarantee safety.
• it is always expensive, if we want to apply this principle to it best.
• it doesn't have a standard order for all kinds of risk. The application varies from risk to risk, also depending on locations of the risk.
Explanation: The ALARP principle is that risk shall be reduced as far as reasonably practicable. This means that zero risk can not be achieved. But we can achieve zero accident, using the ALARP principle.
Before we can boast for achieving ALARP, we must check if the risk is equal or less than time spent,cost, the trouble or challenge, and the physical difficulty of taking a good measure to avoid the risk. If the risk is equal or less than this variables, that means that the risk has been reduced as far as reasonably practicable.
<span>constitution, approve presidential appointments</span>
