Answer:
16:4
24:6
32:8
40:10
Step-by-step explanation:
All of these are equivalent ratios for 8:2
31.5 is the answer to your problem
No it's not a reasonable conclusion. Correlation does not lead to causation. If two variables are linked, then they may affect one another or there may be another set of factors involved. There isn't enough info to know for sure. The fact that r = -0.7 is fairly close to r = -1 indicates there's moderately strong negative correlation, but I don't think it's strong enough in my opinion. More research is needed.
In short, the keyword "caused" as part of the claim is what makes it unreasonable. There is no way to know that not eating vegetables leads to high blood pressure. It may be true but again, more info is needed.
Answer:
602.50 hours
Step-by-step explanation:
Given that a manufacturing plant uses light bulbs whose life spans are normally distributed, with mean and standard deviation equal to 500 and 50 hours,
It was decided to replace the bulbs so that no more than 2% of the bulbs to burn out between replacement periods
i.e. we have to construct 98% confidence interval right tailed to get this.
Z value is 2.05 for this (Upper tailed 0.98 probability)
Hence margin of error
The upper bound for this would be
So to keep below 2% the bulbs to burn out it should be replaced before 602.50 hours.
Answer:
x=54
Step-by-step explanation:
since the line opposite of x is tangent to the circle, the angle made but the point is 90 degrees, so then you add 90 and 36 and subtract that by 180 to get the other angle.