Answer:
False
Explanation:
The expected value of each course of action in a decision tree is not determined by starting at the beginning of the tree, instead it is a process because you need to make a desition and in some extend you espect to have some results but some of them are uncertain or unespected. in this kind of scheme Squares represent decisions, and circles represent uncertain outcomes. Then you need to calcule the desition nodes giving each option a cost or value, This will give you a value that represents the benefit of each decision. at the end calculating choose the option that has the largest benefit, and take that as the decision made. This is the value of that decision node.
Answer:
B) cognitive dissonance
Explanation:
According to my research on studies conducted by various psychologists, I can say that based on the information provided within the question his attitude change is best explained by cognitive dissonance. This is defined as the state of having inconsistent thoughts, beliefs, or attitudes, especially as relating to behavioral decisions and attitude change. Which is exactly what Fernando is experiencing.
I hope this answered your question. If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at Brainly.
The proposed response of Adam Smith based on each scenario is given below:
<h3>Scenario 1</h3>
He would say that the pricing system should remain the main determinant of the market and the interference of the government was uncalled for.
<h3>Scenario 2</h3>
He would side with the free market system and be an opponent of the law that frowns on importation.
<h3>Scenario 3</h3>
He would support the suspension of the antitrust laws.
<h3>Scenario 4</h3>
He would believe that markets should not be regulated and the free market system should continue.
<h3>Who is Adam Smith?</h3>
He is the father of modern economics for his work in pioneering ideas such as free trade and the gross domestic product
Hence, we can see that the proposed response of Adam Smith based on each scenario is given above.
Read more about Adam Smith here:
brainly.com/question/50
#SPJ1
Answer:
E. $63,401
Explanation:
gain on disposal = salvage value of plant - book value on date of sale
= $5,790 - $4,820
= $970
tax on disposal = $970*35%
= $339.50
after tax salvage value = $5,790 - $339.50
= $5,450.50
total cash flow in 4 years
= annual operating cash flow + net working capital + after tax salvage value
= $53,500 + $4,450 + $5,450.50
= $63,401
Therefore, The Year 4 cash flow is $63,401.
Answer:
The Common Good Ethics Approach.
Explanation:
It is been argued that the best society is been guided by the people's general will.This was postulated by a French philosopher by name Jean Jacques Rousseau who lived in the year 1712 to 1778.
This approach to Ethics empathizes respect and compassion for others,most especially those vulnerable.
The employers ability to voice out their grievances,suggestions and contributions to the daily running of the organisation coupled alongside the mangers compassion and respect for all individuals confirms to my first statement which says 'The best society is been guided by the people's will ' and that supports the common good Approach.