It would be the power to "<span>B. make treaties with foreign countries," that is an inherent power of the national government, since it would be nonsensical for the individual states to attempt to do so. </span>
Both were famous abolitionist in the U.S. although Garrison was white and Douglass was black. They <span>were also close friends and co-workers in the American Anti-Slavery Society up till 1850 when bills for the Compromise were passed.
Garrison to Douglass: with California joining as a free state, we may soon have sufficient support to overturn the Constitution and write a new one. I hope it will be done in a peaceful manner though.
Douglass to Garrison: the founding fathers did not see slavery as a long term phenomenon here; just as Washington DC is ending the slave trade now. We do not need a new Constitution but there may be conflicts when slavery is abolished.
</span><span>
</span>
Answer:
No
Explanation:
They created checks and balances to make sure one branch didn't get more powerful than the other. This makes it very unlikely that congress would get more emphasis on power than the other branches.
HAHAHA I need that too for mrs long!!!!
Answer:
Correct answer is C. The resignation of Mikhail Gorbachev
Explanation:
Option A is not correct as this treaties are important for the limitation of weapon arsenal, but didn't lead to end of Cold War.
B is not correct as the defeat of US in this war showed that Communism is still alive.
C is correct as after his removal Soviet Union was dissolved, which led to end of Cold war.
D is not correct as China was opened towards the west even during the Cold war.
