Situation: <u>Walk down an ecological path in an natural park during a field-trip. </u>
According to Jean Piaget's (a Swiss psychologist widely known for his work on child development, and one of his land mark theories, <em>cognitive development theory)</em>:
- a preoperational stage of development is characterized by the consolidation of language skills and a lacking of concrete logic thinking and also being unable to take the point of view of other people.
- In contrast, operational stage of development, children thinking still moves in a concrete plane, children become much more logical and sophisticated in their thinking during this stage of development and are able to draw conclusions based on <em>inductive logic, </em>which is referred to as going from a concrete experience to a principle.
This being said, going back to our situation, a child in a preoperational stage of development walking down a natural park in a field trip with his family, but will probably be more concentrated on wildllife and general surrounding than on the importance of threes as shade providers, shelter food and other ecological services.
On the other hand, children in an operational stage of development in the same situation would be able to draw conclusions based on the importance of trees and the wide variety of ecological services they offer, and infer that places like the natural park (and other smaller, less complex parks) are important means of conservations.
Answer:
I'd focus on the training of all employees in behaivour and ethical actions implementing a mandatory policy training.
Explanation:
The memo could be something like: "The bank will publish standards governing the actions of employees and actions of the business, whilst implementing a mandatory policy training for all employees"
Relations among Muslims, Jews, and Christians have been shaped not only by the theologies and beliefs of the three religions, but also, and often more strongly, by the historical circumstances in which they are found. As a result, history has become a foundation for religious understanding. In each historical phase, the definition of who was regarded as Muslim, Jewish, or Christian shifted, sometimes indicating only a religious identification, but more often indicating a particular social, economic, or political group.
While the tendency to place linguistic behaviour, religious identity, and cultural heritage under one, pure definition has existed for a very long time, our modern age with its ideology of nationalism is particularly prone to such a conflation. Ethnic identities have sometimes been conflated with religious identities by both outsiders and insiders, complicating the task of analyzing intergroup and intercommunal relations. For example, Muslims have often been equated with Arabs, effacing the existence of Christian and Jewish Arabs (i.e., members of those religions whose language is Arabic and who participate primarily in Arab culture), ignoring non-Arab Muslims who constitute the majority of Muslims in the world. In some instances, relations between Arabs and Israelis have been understood as Muslim-Jewish relations, ascribing aspects of Arab culture to the religion of Islam and Israeli culture to Judaism. This is similar to what happened during the Crusades, during which Christian Arabs were often charged with being identical to Muslims by the invading Europeans. While the cultures in which Islam predominates do not necessarily make sharp distinctions between the religious and secular aspects of the culture, such distinctions make the task of understanding the nature of relations among Muslims, Jews, and Christians easier, and therefore will be used as an analytic tool in this chapter.
<span>The right answer is "Role performance does not always match role expectation". <span>Generally,
different abilities are attributed to each gender, considering that the
opposite gender is deficient in that ability, however, this is usually
more a stereotype linked to the role of the gender that has something
real.</span></span>
Answer:
Because of its high latitude, there are times in the winter when the sun never comes up, and times in the summer when the sun never goes down.
Explanation:
This is true in Barrow, Alaska, a place that is characterized by having the longest and shortest day.
It has been observed that around May of every year when the sun rises it doesn’t set for about three months. And again, around November in the same year, when the sun sets, the people or inhabitants don’t get to see the sun for about two months.
Hence, the interesting fact about Alaska ha that it has high latitude, whereby there are times in the winter when the sun never comes up, and times in the summer when the sun never goes down.
