1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
9966 [12]
3 years ago
10

My teacher never taught us this so idk how to do it

Mathematics
1 answer:
Verdich [7]3 years ago
6 0

{x}^{3}  = 6\Leftrightarrow  \sqrt[3]{ {x}^{3} }  =  \sqrt[3]{6} \Leftrightarrow x =  \sqrt[3]{6}

You might be interested in
Which is less, 8 ½ pounds or 130 ounces?
Harman [31]
Do you know how to convert pounds to ounces
3 0
2 years ago
For the rational function f(x)= 5x3-x/2x3 , identify any removable discontinuities.
Ierofanga [76]

Answer:

Earlier this month, news broke of progress on this 82-year-old question, thanks to prolific mathematician Terence Tao. And while the story of Tao’s breakthrough is good news, the problem isn’t fully solved.

A refresher on the Collatz Conjecture: It’s all about that function f(n), shown above, which takes even numbers and cuts them in half, while odd numbers get tripled and then added to 1. Take any natural number, apply f, then apply f again and again. You eventually land on 1, for every number we’ve ever checked. The Conjecture is that this is true for all natural numbers.

Tao’s recent work is a near-solution to the Collatz Conjecture in some subtle ways. But his methods most likely can’t be adapted to yield a complete solution to the problem, as he subsequently explained. So we might be working on it for decades longer.

The Conjecture is in the math discipline known as Dynamical Systems, or the study of situations that change over time in semi-predictable ways. It looks like a simple, innocuous question, but that’s what makes it special. Why is such a basic question so hard to answer? It serves as a benchmark for our understanding; once we solve it, then we can proceed to much more complicated matters.

The study of dynamical systems could become more robust than anyone today could imagine. But we’ll need to solve the Collatz Conjecture for the subject to flourish.

Step-by-step explanation:

Earlier this month, news broke of progress on this 82-year-old question, thanks to prolific mathematician Terence Tao. And while the story of Tao’s breakthrough is good news, the problem isn’t fully solved.

A refresher on the Collatz Conjecture: It’s all about that function f(n), shown above, which takes even numbers and cuts them in half, while odd numbers get tripled and then added to 1. Take any natural number, apply f, then apply f again and again. You eventually land on 1, for every number we’ve ever checked. The Conjecture is that this is true for all natural numbers.

Tao’s recent work is a near-solution to the Collatz Conjecture in some subtle ways. But his methods most likely can’t be adapted to yield a complete solution to the problem, as he subsequently explained. So we might be working on it for decades longer.

The Conjecture is in the math discipline known as Dynamical Systems, or the study of situations that change over time in semi-predictable ways. It looks like a simple, innocuous question, but that’s what makes it special. Why is such a basic question so hard to answer? It serves as a benchmark for our understanding; once we solve it, then we can proceed to much more complicated matters.

The study of dynamical systems could become more robust than anyone today could imagine. But we’ll need to solve the Collatz Conjecture for the subject to flourish.Earlier this month, news broke of progress on this 82-year-old question, thanks to prolific mathematician Terence Tao. And while the story of Tao’s breakthrough is good news, the problem isn’t fully solved.

A refresher on the Collatz Conjecture: It’s all about that function f(n), shown above, which takes even numbers and cuts them in half, while odd numbers get tripled and then added to 1. Take any natural number, apply f, then apply f again and again. You eventually land on 1, for every number we’ve ever checked. The Conjecture is that this is true for all natural numbers.

Tao’s recent work is a near-solution to the Collatz Conjecture in some subtle ways. But his methods most likely can’t be adapted to yield a complete solution to the problem, as he subsequently explained. So we might be working on it for decades longer.

The Conjecture is in the math discipline known as Dynamical Systems, or the study of situations that change over time in semi-predictable ways. It looks like a simple, innocuous question, but that’s what makes it special. Why is such a basic question so hard to answer? It serves as a benchmark for our understanding; once we solve it, then we can proceed to much more complicated matters.

The study of dynamical systems could become more robust than anyone today could imagine. But we’ll need to solve the Collatz Conjecture for the subject to flourish.Earlier this month, news broke of progress on this 82-year-old question, thanks to prolific mathematician Terence Tao. And while the story of Tao’s breakthrough is good news, the problem isn’t fully solved.

A refresher on the Collatz Conjecture: It’s all about that function f(n), shown above, which takes even numbers and cuts them in half, while odd numbers get tripled and then added to 1. Take any natural number, apply f, then apply f again and again. You eventually land on 1, for every number we’ve ever checked. The Conjecture is that this is true for all natural numbers.

Tao’s rece

3 0
3 years ago
The sum of two polynomials is â€"yz2 â€" 3z2 â€" 4y 4. If one of the polynomials is y â€" 4yz2 â€" 3, what is the other polynomi
gtnhenbr [62]

The sum of polynomials involves adding the polynomials

The other polynomial is y^3 -y^2+ 4y - 1

The sum of the polynomials is given as:

Sum = y^3 + 3y^2 + 4y - 4

One of the polynomials is given as:

P = 4y^2 - 3

Represent the other polynomial with Q.

So, we have:

P +Q =Sum

Substitute the expressions for P and Sum

4y^2 - 3 +Q =y^3 + 3y^2 + 4y - 4

Make Q the subject

Q =y^3 + 3y^2 -4y^2+ 4y - 4 +3

Evaluate like terms

Q =y^3 -y^2+ 4y - 1

Hence, the other polynomial is y^3 -y^2+ 4y - 1

Read more about polynomials at:

brainly.com/question/1487158

8 0
3 years ago
Solve for x:<br> 18x + 3x + 4 - 5 = 5(4x – 9
Luden [163]
Answer:
X= - 44
18x+3x+4-5=5(4x9
Collect like terms
21x+4-5=5(4x-9
More variable to the left hand side and change its sign
21x-20x-1=-45
Correct like terms
X=-45+1
Which is x=-44
4 0
3 years ago
Kim makes spiced tea from her mother's recipe. The recipe calls for 2 %
Anna11 [10]

im sorry but i dont know

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Please helpppppppppp :(!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    7·1 answer
  • Bridget has $240. She spent
    9·1 answer
  • There are
    9·2 answers
  • A company had 41 employees in order 980 uniforms for them if they want to give each employee same number of uniforms how many mo
    13·1 answer
  • Capacity of the football stadium.<br> A) Quantitative<br> B Qualitative
    12·2 answers
  • hi please help asap (20 points) and can you please explain a tool that i can use to solve this problem so that i can study
    14·1 answer
  • Will a 13% increase followed by a 13% decrease result in no net change?
    14·2 answers
  • What is -2 times 3 divide by 2 times 2 plus 2 minus 2 times 2
    15·2 answers
  • There are 2.54 centimeters in 1 inch. There are 100 centimeters in 1 meter.
    6·2 answers
  • What’s the answer and can someone please explain it?
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!