Answer:
either he died or he moved or he is in a coma
Explanation:
i need more backstory to go on but for now heres a couple answers
plz give brainliest
"only landscapes" would turn to "videos that have only landscapes"
Answer:
A) the narrator’s description of the land.
Explanation:
Ulrich von Gradwitz is the proprietor of the timberland. He is a circuitous character on the grounds that the creator didn't make reference to his trademark however we can some way or another show from his deeds.
Ulrich most intently watches one specific segment of the woodland in light of the fact that Georg Znaeym likewise guarantees responsibility for. In Ulrich's granddad's time, his family utilized the court to catch the land from the neighboring Znaeym family, who the Gradwitzs accepted illicitly had the land. The Znaeyms never acknowledged the court's choice, and have kept on chasing in the timberland fix. Ulrich has turned out to be significantly increasingly committed to securing the land and crushing the Znaeyms than the prior ages of his family were. He meanders the timberland with a group of men and his rifle, planning to shoot Georg rather than the amusement. Notwithstanding, when Ulrich is at long last alone with Georg, a brush with death causes Ulrich to reexamine his needs, and offer harmony and companionship to his deep rooted opponent.
Answer:
<u>Step 1: Determine which options are correct </u>
<em>What will the economy be like in the future? </em>
- Option A: too broad
<em>How can virtual reality be used in health care? </em>
- Option C: effective
<em>How many gallons of water will we use in 2025? </em>
- Option B: too narrow
<em>What are the best strategies for increasing food production in the future? </em>
- Option C: effective
For the first question, the reason why it is too broad is because the economy in the future is a huge topic. It will not be able to be covered in one topic. In questions two, the reason why the answer is effective is because this is a specified research question in a wide category. For the third question, the answer is too narrow because there is really no use of knowing how much gallons of water we will use in 2025. Finally, in the fourth question the answer is effective because it is a specified research question in a specific topic/category.
<em>See the attachment for clarification</em>
The answer is a furniture because all others are uncountable
