Answer:
vertical marketing system
Explanation:
Based on the scenario being described within the question it can be said that this scenario represents the first phase of a vertical marketing system. This is a cooperative system of business, in which members work together in order to correctly promote efficient manufacturing and product delivery to the customers, to meet customer needs.
Answer:
option (a) is correct.
Explanation:
Economic profits refers to the profits which comes out after deducting the implicit costs and explicit costs from the total revenue.
Whereas the accounting profits takes into the effect of explicit costs only.
Implicit cost refers to the loss of money income by choosing some other alternative. It is also known as the opportunity cost.
Explicit costs refers to the costs that are incurred for operating or running a business.
Accounting profit = Total revenue - Explicit costs
Economic profit = Total revenue - Explicit costs - Implicit costs
Therefore, if the implicit costs are greater than zero then the economic profits is less than the accounting profits.
Balance sheet.
The balance sheet shows assets, liabilities, and stockholder's equity. Buying the van on credit would be a liability.
The 4-year term instrument's nominal rate is higher than the 2-year term instrument's nominal rate.
What is nominal rate?
The increase in payment you make to the lender for using the borrowed funds is known as the nominal interest rate.
The rate of compounding is higher for 2-year investments than for 4-year investments, which are compounded semi-annually.
As a result, option (b) is correct.
Learn more about on nominal rate, here:
brainly.com/question/13324776
#SPJ1
Answer:
c. liable on the ground that Mesa is an intended third-party beneficiary
Explanation:
In a contract, the third-party beneficiary is a business or a person that benefits from the agreement and the terms of the contract that is made between the two other parties. According to law, third-party beneficiary have certain rights which they can enforced if the contract is not fulfilled.
In the context, Mesa is a third party beneficiary. The Mesa County enters into a contract with New Construct Inc. to construct a court house. Now New Construct Inc. again hires the firm Odell to excavate the land site.
While excavating Odell damages few nearby properties, so Mesa County files a law suit against Odell. But Odell argues that Odell is not in agreement with Mesa County or have not entered into with any contract with the County, so Mesa cannot sue the excavator.
But the court hold that as Mesa County is the third party beneficiary of the contract and have certain rights, Odell is held liable for the loss and should compensate for the loss to the County.
