Intermediate sanctions give a contrasting option to prison time and probation. Hence, they increment the judge's flexibility in punishing. A few sorts incorporate house capture, fines, checking, community service, and special living groups etc. Intermediate sanctions work better in many ways, like monitoring closely an offender can safeguard the community form an offender as well as can relate to the severity of the punishment of the offender. Another improvement can be the community service if ordered in that capacity.
Answer: School Judges should not be able to hand down sentences based on the characteristics based on the individual. I know this because everybody makes mistakes, and if you base a person off the mistakes they might've made in the past, your biased and unfair. From my background knowledge, I remember a show on TV called divorce court, this man was judged because of mistakes he did when he was fifteen, he didn't even know better, and he might've been battling his own mind, he didn't deserve to be judged based on his past mistakes. In conclusion, judges should not be able to hand down sentences based on the characteristics of an individual because it's biased.
Explanation:
Some aspects of culture are value, language, religion, architecture, customs and traditions, and government.
Answer:
I think it's "They have a time-proven way of doing things."
The correct answer is the talking cure.
The notable psychologist, Sigmund Freud, claimed that talk therapy or the talking cure- which involves talking about one's thoughts, feelings and problems with a therapist- is a highly effective way of treating psychological and emotional problems. The talking cure is widely used today in order to manage and treat psychological issues in individuals.
