Based on historical perspective, how the expansion of European commerce between 1648 and 1815 represents continuity from the previous period include "<u>conquered lands to accommodate the growing populations</u>."
The previous period before 1648 to 1815, can be considered to be around 1500 to 1648.
This period was characterized by the growing populations of Europe, the discovery of nearby lands, improvement in trading activities among the European countries, and the accumulation of wealth, among others.
Thus, from 1648 to 1815, Europe tried to expand its trading activities and diversify its population by moving towards the west to get more gold and land resources.
This leads to the formation of imperialism of Europe in America between 1648 to, 1815 thereby continuing their previous expansion.
Hence, in this case, it is concluded that the expansion of European commerce between 1648 and 1815 represents continuity from the previous period in many ways.
Learn more here: brainly.com/question/14139538
Explanation:
Is there a list of choices to select from?
Answer:
- Prisoners were allowed to leave for work
- Prisoners were unable to permanently leave
Explanation:
Carmichael was known as an Honorary Prime Minister to the Black Panther Party, a revolutionary self defense group. They fought back with violence, which opposed they views of King. They simply did not agree because King valued a nonviolent approach while Carmichael believed violence should be incited in defense
The system of checks and balances is the American Federal Government's way of ensuring that each branch has its own responsibilities but also has responsibilities, limits, and obligations as it pertains to the other branches of government.
This has worked well for most of the country's history but since the 1930s, the Presidency/Executive branch has become the branch that is possibly more powerful than the rest, especially in the minds of the people.
This is seen in the modern era, with the Presidency leading legislative pushes and leading their parties representatives in the House and Senate.
To fix this, the first step would be for the Senate to regain its authority when it comes to Foreign Affairs. Starting in the 1950s, the Executive branch used legal but suspect schemes to circumvent Congress' singular right to Declare war.
So, for the last 17 years, America has been fighting a war on terrorism without a Congressional declaration of war. The last time Congress declared war was in 1942, so Korea/Vietnam/Gulf War I/etc. were all accomplished without a Congressional declaration.
What we will need to see if Congress stepping up and acting like a co-equal branch of Government, instead of a branch subservient to the interests of the executive branch.
