Step-by-step explanation:
this is really complicated and tricky.
to create the next number, you have to add the first 2 digits of the previous number, then subtract the 3rd from the 2nd digit, multiply the 3rd and the 4th digit, and finally divide the 4th digit by the 5th.
so,
8+8 = 16
8-5 = 3
5×1 = 5
1/1 = 1
giving 16351 as next number.
the missing number we get then
1+6 = 7
6-3 = 3
3×5 = 15
5/1 = 5
giving 73155 as the next (missing) number.
control :
7+3 = 10
3-1 = 2
1×5 = 5
5/5 = 1
gives us 10251 as next number - correct.
but then it will end
1+0 = 1
0-2 = -2 ???? take the absolute value ?
2×5 = 10
5/1 = 5
Number 1 because of the buttcheeks in the center
I don’t know the answer but I need a answer to this
Answer:
Since the calculated value of z= -1.496 does not fall in the critical region z < -1.645 we conclude that the new program is effective. We fail to reject the null hypothesis .
Step-by-step explanation:
The sample proportion is p2= 7/27= 0.259
and q2= 0.74
The sample size = n= 27
The population proportion = p1= 0.4
q1= 0.6
We formulate the null and alternate hypotheses that the new program is effective
H0: p2> p1 vs Ha: p2 ≤ p1
The test statistic is
z= p2- p1/√ p1q1/n
z= 0.259-0.4/ √0.4*0.6/27
z= -0.141/0.09428
z= -1.496
The significance level ∝ is 0.05
The critical region for one tailed test is z ≤ ± 1.645
Since the calculated value of z= -1.496 does not fall in the critical region z < -1.645 we conclude that the new program is effective. We fail to reject the null hypothesis .
