1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
irina [24]
3 years ago
7

1. _______built the first paddle-wheel steamboat 2. _______improved the steam engine 3. _______leader in the struggle for Italia

n unification4.________an intellectual movement noted for its appreciation of feelings and human emotion 5.________led revolts against Spanish Rule in Venezuela, Colombia, and Ecuador
History
1 answer:
Helga [31]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

1) Robert Fulton built the first paddle operate rated steamboat in 1807.  

2) James Watt improved the steam engine and revolutionised its use by adding a separate condenser in the original design.

3)  Giuseppe Garibaldi was the Italian leader and hero of the Italian unification, other important leaders of modern Italy.

4) Romanticism was the revolt against the aristocratic political and social norms of the age of enlightenment. It reacted against the scientific rationalisation of nature.

5) Miguel Hidalgo was leader of Mexican War of independence and a Roman Catholic priest

You might be interested in
The Swahili Coast was a marketplace for traders from which locations? Check all that apply.
____ [38]
The correct answers are Arabia, Asia, and North Africa. Other countries, especially European ones, went to other places to do their trading business, many times not even knowing that some of their goods came from the Swahili Coast.
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Ukiyo-e were woodblock prints that impacted artists in Europe and America, especially impressionists.
Bess [88]
This is true. The Ukiyo-e was a type of art creating that came form Japan and that impressionists were known for incorporating. The idea was called Japonism and was common in France who studied the Japanese arts extensively and found a way to incorporate their ideas in their art.
3 0
3 years ago
How was representation in congress to be based, according to the terms of the great compromise?
Licemer1 [7]
The number of representatives would depend of the states' population.  
3 0
3 years ago
HELP!!!! 10 POINTS!!!
o-na [289]

The definition of Birds of passage is hose who intended to immigrate temporarily to earn money and then return home. So I would say the first answer.

Hope I helped.

Could I please get brainliest.

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Understanding the Case
S_A_V [24]

Answer:

Marbury: Was appointed as a federal judge - Supported the Judiciary Act of 1789 - Argued for original jurisdiction.

-Madison: Refused to honor an appointment.Explanation:

Marbury v. Madison was a judicial case resolved by the Supreme Court of the United States in 1803. It arose as a result of a political dispute following the presidential elections of 1800, in which Thomas Jefferson, who was a Democratic Republican, defeated then-President John Adams, who was a federalist. In the last days of the outgoing government of Adams, the Congress, dominated by the federalists, established a series of judicial positions, among them 42 justices the of peace for the District of Columbia. The Senate confirmed the appointments, the president signed them and the Secretary of State was in charge of sealing and delivering the appointment documents. In the last-minute hustle and bustle, the outgoing secretary of state did not deliver the minutes of appointment to four justices of the peace, including William Marbury.

The new secretary of state under President Jefferson, James Madison, refused to deliver the minutes of appointment as the new government was irritated by the maneuver of the federalists of trying to secure control of the judiciary with the appointment of members of their party just before ceasing in government. However, Marbury appealed to the Supreme Court to order Madison to deliver his record.

If the Court ruled in favor of Marbury, Madison could still refuse to deliver the record and the Supreme Court would have no way to enforce the order. If the Court ruled against Marbury, it risked submitting the judiciary to Jefferson's supporters by allowing them to deny Marbury the position he could legally claim. Chief Justice John Marshall resolved this dilemma by deciding that the Supreme Court was not empowered to settle this case. Marshall ruled that Section 13 of the Judiciary Act, which granted the Court these powers, was unconstitutional because it extended the original jurisdiction of the Court to the jurisdiction defined by the Constitution itself. Having decided not to intervene in this particular case, the Supreme Court secured its position as final arbiter of the law.

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Amnesty International is a(n) __________ organization concerned primarily with __________.
    7·2 answers
  • How does the battle over the taft-hartley act demonstrate the constitution's version of checks and balances?
    6·1 answer
  • By the time of the Yalta Conference, the Soviet Union had yet to declare war on Japan. What influenced Joseph Stalin to agree to
    13·1 answer
  • I really need help ASAP please I will mark branlist
    15·1 answer
  • The NAACP worked to
    13·2 answers
  • What would happen if Nixon was impeached?
    9·1 answer
  • In the early years of the Cold War United States foreign policy was dedicated to containing
    10·1 answer
  • Summary of the battle of New Orleans in one paragraph, please
    7·1 answer
  • WILL MARK BRANLIEST
    12·1 answer
  • In the 1918/1919 Pandemic how did people protect themselves from getting what was called "The Spanish Influenza"? Select 3 corre
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!