Here we can use fact than we can multiply fraction by inverse of fraction instead of dividing it.
Inverse of 1/3 is 3/1
Lets multiply it

- its our result
x+2 > 10 solves to x > 8 after we subtract 2 from both sides
So set A is the set of real numbers that are larger than 8. The value 8 itself is not in set A. The same can be said about 5 as well.
Set B is the set of values that are larger than 5 since 2x > 10 turns into x > 5 after dividing both sides by 2. The value x = 5 is not in set B since x > 5 would turn into 5 > 5 which is false. The values x = 6, x = 8, and x = 9 are in set B.
----------------
Summarizing everything, we can say...
5 is not in set A. True
5 is in set B. False
6 is in set A. False
6 is not in set B. False
8 is not in set A. True
8 is in set B. True
9 is in set A. True
9 is not in set B. False
In an arithmetic sequence, the difference between consecutive terms is constant. In formulas, there exists a number
such that

In an geometric sequence, the ratio between consecutive terms is constant. In formulas, there exists a number
such that

So, there exists infinite sequences that are not arithmetic nor geometric. Simply choose a sequence where neither the difference nor the ratio between consecutive terms is constant.
For example, any sequence starting with

Won't be arithmetic nor geometric. It's not arithmetic (no matter how you continue it, indefinitely), because the difference between the first two numbers is 14, and between the second and the third is -18, and thus it's not constant. It's not geometric either, because the ratio between the first two numbers is 15, and between the second and the third is -1/5, and thus it's not constant.
Uh oh speggego's im telling teacher lol