Because a decrease in real autonomous spending results in a <u>fall</u> in the price level, the ultimate effect on real GDP is<u> smaller</u> that predicted by the multiplier.
Another significant discovery is made by Keynesian economics. You've learnt that Keynesians think fluctuations in total spending are what ultimately determine the level of economic activity in the short run (or aggregate demand).
Assume that full employment prevails in an economy because the macro equilibrium occurs at the potential GDP.
Keynes noted that even while the economy starts at potential GDP, it is improbable that it will stay there because aggregate demand has a propensity to fluctuate.
In 2007, the collapse of the housing market caused a decline in U.S. investment spending. The Great Recession subsequently hit the American economy as a result.
To learn more about Keynesian here
brainly.com/question/17247821
#SPJ4
Do it yourself this gets you no where im sorry
Answer:
Net dollar sales projection for this year = 516,971.00
Explanation:
<em>Projected sales volume </em>
130%× 4,600= 5,980units
<em>Project selling price</em>
=140% × $65
= $91
<em>Total sales value </em>
= $91 × 5980units
= $ 544,180.00
<em>Net dollar sales projection</em>
= Total sales value - Returned merchandise
= 544,180.00 - (5% × 544,180.00 )
= $ 516,971.00
Net dollar sales projection for this year = 516,971.00
Answer: threat of new entrants will prevent the prices from rising above the competitive level.
Explanation:
A contestable market has competition such that sellers cannot unilaterally decide to sell at a certain price. They have to sell at a competitive price that is set by the market to ensure that goods are allocated efficiently.
If the prices attempt to rise above this competitive level, new sellers will enter the market so as to make a profit which would have the effect of driving the price back down to where it was and even lower if even more sellers come in. The price is therefore maintained to ensure that this does not happen.
