1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Oliga [24]
3 years ago
5

M1 money growth in the u.s. was about 16% in 2008, 7% in 2009, and 9% in 2010. over the same time period, the yield on 3-month t

reasury bills fell from almost 3% to close to 0%. given these high rates of money growth, why did interest rates fall, rather than increase?
Business
1 answer:
posledela3 years ago
7 0
M1 money growth in the US was about 16% in 2008, 7% in 2009 and 9% in 2010. Over the same time period, the yield on 3-month Treasury bills fell from almost 3% to close to 0%. Given these high rates of money growth, why did interest rates fall, rather than increase? What does this say about the income, price level and expected-inflation effects?
Higher money growth (increase in the money supply) should have the following effects:
Liquidity effect indicates that this growth in money should shift money supply to the right, which should decrease the interest rate.
Income effect indicates that the growth in money should increase income levels, which should increase the demand for money and shift the demand curve to the right. This should increase the interest rate.
The price level effect indicates that the growth in money should increase price levels, which should increase the demand for money and shift the demand curve to the right. This should also increase the interest rate.
During this time period, unemployment was high, economic growth was weak and policymakers were more concerned with deflation than they were with inflation.
Therefore, the expected inflation effect was almost non-existent (due to the concerns with deflation) and the liquidity effect dominated all other effects, which made interest rates fall.
<span>This is illustrated with the first graph on slide 32 of the Theory of Money Powerpoints.</span>
You might be interested in
Repost because it got lost in a sea of questions)
saveliy_v [14]

Answer:

YESSSSSS

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What should you do when planning for college?
Vsevolod [243]

Answer:

a way to get a large amout of money (legally) to pay off the debt

more money for a place to live

and even more money to get food and other impoartant things to live

Explanation:

an alternative to stocks, but school never taught you what stocks are, so now get more money to buy a phone so u can have basic knowlede

and illegal alternative is to sell something adictive like drugs, cigs. or start a casino or scam pp, for money, or rob a bank

7 0
2 years ago
You just purchased a parcel of land for $10,000. if you expect a 12% annual rate of return on your investment, how much will you
Sunny_sXe [5.5K]

I guess the closest answer is $31,060.

If you purchased a parcel of land for $10,000. If you expect a 12% annual rate of return on your investment. Therefore you can sell the land for in 10 years in $31,060.

4 0
3 years ago
What is the richest state?
Ivanshal [37]

Colorado not even kidding

8 0
3 years ago
Suppose Raphael and Susan are playing a game in which both must simultaneously choose the action Left or Right. The payoff matri
erica [24]

Answer: Please refer to Explanation

Explanation:

The Dominant Strategy in a game is the strategy that a player will choose that will provide them with the highest payoff regardless of what the other player does.

In the above, the dominant strategy will be for RAPHAEL to choose LEFT.

By choosing left Raphael makes a payoff of 4 if Susan picks Left as well and a Payoff of 6 if Sudan picks Right. This is better than him picking Right and he will get a Payoff of 3 if Susan chooses Right as well.

The Nash Equilibrium is the strategy where both are making the best that they can given the strategy of the other player and deviating from it will give them less pay out.

The dominant strategy therefore is for RAPHAEL to choose LEFT and for SUSAN to choose RIGHT.

This is because Raphael will pick Left as it maximises their payoff and Susan will then pick a strategy that gives her the highest payoff based on Raphael's decision which is to go RIGHT.

7 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • Semiotics refers to a field of study in marketing linguistics that identifies the connotative meanings behind words in order to
    5·1 answer
  • Complete the statement with correct word in a recent survey. It was observed that many Asian youths have stated watching America
    15·2 answers
  • During the current month, Sheffield Company incurs the following manufacturing costs. (a) Purchased raw materials of $17,800 on
    14·1 answer
  • Why private limited companies in malaysia does not get listed in the stock exchange?​
    14·1 answer
  • Why is gasoline weighted more heavily than tomatoes in a calculation of the annual inflation rate in the United States
    6·2 answers
  • Merle Industries had been selling its product for $24 per unit, but recently lowered the selling price to $17 per unit. The comp
    5·1 answer
  • Horizontal analysis evaluates a series of financial statement data over a period of time:
    6·1 answer
  • 50K in 2018 what does it mean or what is it?
    13·1 answer
  • at is Dantzler's horizon, or continuing, value? (Hint: Find the value of all free cash flows beyond Year 3 discounted back to Ye
    7·1 answer
  • Which information would most likely cause a company's stock price to go up?
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!