Answer:
Yes, it would be statistically significant
Step-by-step explanation:
The information given are;
The percentage of jawbreakers it produces that weigh more than 0.4 ounces = 60%
Number of jawbreakers in the sample, n = 800
The mean proportion of jawbreakers that weigh more than 0.4 = 60% = 0.6 =
=p
The formula for the standard deviation of a proportion is ![\sigma _{\hat p} =\sqrt{\dfrac{p(1-p)}{n} }](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Csigma%20%20_%7B%5Chat%20p%7D%20%3D%5Csqrt%7B%5Cdfrac%7Bp%281-p%29%7D%7Bn%7D%20%7D)
Solving for the standard deviation gives;
![\sigma _{\hat p} =\sqrt{\dfrac{0.6 \cdot (1-0.6)}{800} } = 0.0173](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Csigma%20%20_%7B%5Chat%20p%7D%20%3D%5Csqrt%7B%5Cdfrac%7B0.6%20%5Ccdot%20%281-0.6%29%7D%7B800%7D%20%7D%20%3D%200.0173)
Given that the mean proportion is 0.6, the expected value of jawbreakers that weigh more than 0.4 in the sample of 800 = 800*0.6 = 480
For statistical significance the difference from the mean = 2×
= 2*0.0173 = 0.0346 the equivalent number of Jaw breakers = 800*0.0346 = 27.7
The z-score of 494 jawbreakers is given as follows;
![Z=\dfrac{x-\mu _{\hat p} }{\sigma _{\hat p} }](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=Z%3D%5Cdfrac%7Bx-%5Cmu%20_%7B%5Chat%20p%7D%20%7D%7B%5Csigma%20_%7B%5Chat%20p%7D%20%20%7D)
![Z=\dfrac{494-480 }{0.0173 } = 230.94](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=Z%3D%5Cdfrac%7B494-480%20%7D%7B0.0173%20%20%7D%20%3D%20230.94)
Therefore, the z-score more than 2 ×
which is significant.