Answer:
B
Explanation:
Real GDP measure total economic output by an economy in a specific geographical boundary regardless of ownership of factors of production, within a year, ceteris paribus.
Real GDP is a good indicator but is not a perfect indicator as underground economy (private tuition whereby taxes and consumption of goods and services) are not accounted for.
Real GDP does not measure Non-Material standard of living like leisure hours, health and life expectancy... It needs other indicators.
Both B and D is a bit effy as:
For D, GDP does not even measure such Non-Material SOL
For B, GDP is not 100 percent accurate on measuring household production (local production? I believe there is no such phrasing as household production as by economics, household is involved in household spending, Contributing to Consumption expenditure in Aggregate Demand.) as there are other factors like presence of underground economy that is not accounted for.
However, B seems like the most accurate ans as it still measures national output.
Answer: Statement 1 ( Laptop) = Producer surplus
Statement 2 ( watch ) = Neither
Statement 3 ( jersey sweater) = Consumer surplus
Explanation:
Hi, Consumer surplus happens when the price that consumers pay for a product or service is less than the price they're willing to pay.
- <em>Even though I was willing to pay up to $46 for a jersey sweater, I bought a jersey sweater for only $39. </em>Consumer surplus
Producer surplus<em> </em> is measured as the difference between what producers are willing and able to supply a good for and the price they actually receive
-
<em> I sold a used laptop for $149, even though I was willing to go as low as $140
.</em>Producer surplus
- <em>I sold a watch for $59 on eBay last week. This week, someone offered me $145 for it. </em>neither
Feel free to ask for more if needed or if you did not understand something.
Answer and Explanation:
The computation is shown below:
a. The expected value of payout arise from emergency is
= 0.01 × $67,500
= $675
b. The expected value of payout arise from capped coverage insuance is
= (0.9 × $500) + (0.09 × $2,500)
= $675
c. The risk averse shows the minimum exposure with respect to the swings of the income or there would be the loss in the income. Since the payout amount is same in both the cases so here we considered option B
I believe the answer is yes? I don’t understand the context behind this
Answer:
produce a profit
Explanation:
<u>Price</u> refers to the amount of money that is paid by one party to another to acquire a particular commodity or in return for unit of commodities. Some of the factors that determines the price of a commodity include cost of production, product demand, product supply, targeted profit, and among others.
A <u>profit</u> is the amount earned from selling a commodity minus the amount expended to purchase, operate, or produce the commodity.
The primary aim of an entrepreneur is to make a profit, and price setting is one of the important activities that influences a profit. Since the higher the price, the higher may be the profit. However, a higher price may also dicourage customers from buying a product and then reduces profit.
Therefore, setting prices for products and services requires entrepreneurs to balance a multitude of complex forces as entrepreneurs determine prices for their goods and services that will draw customers and <u>produce a profit</u>.