1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
saveliy_v [14]
3 years ago
12

Toby and Keith are planning to create and jointly own a company that will license their patented technology solely for royalties

and will not create their own products for sale. Earnings would be distributed to these two owners, rather than retained to grow the business with the view toward selling it or taking it public. These investors want limited liability and do not anticipate raising capital from any other investors. The most suitable form of entity is a:a. C corporation.b. S corporationc. Limited liability companyd. Limited partnership
Business
1 answer:
Fantom [35]3 years ago
3 0

Answer: Limited liability company

Explanation:

In such a structure the owners and the firm are considered separate. The owners in a LLC could not be held personally liable for the debts and liabilities of their company.

The companies have the limited liability feature of the corporations while the profit distribution method depicts partnership structure.

In the given case, Toby and Keith wants to distribute profit among them and also do not want to raise any outside capital. Also they want limited liability in their organisation.

Hence a Limited liability company is an appropriate choice for them.

You might be interested in
Conrad wanted to offer high-quality meals in his restaurant. His motto was "the best darn meat and potatoes for miles
murzikaleks [220]

Given that Conrad's time of service delivery is slow, my advice to him would be that he has to address his quality and his service.

<h3>What is competitive advantage?</h3>

This term as it applies to the question has to do with the advantage that a business has over its competitors.

For Conrad to have this advantage they must try to serve their customers better and stop making them wait for too long.

Read more competitive advantage on here:

brainly.com/question/14030554

.

8 0
2 years ago
A situation in which financial or other personal considerations have the potential to compromise or bias professional judgment a
STatiana [176]
The circumstance is called Conflict of Interest. It is a circumstance in which a man or association is engaged with various interests, money related or else, one of which could degenerate the inspiration or basic leadership of that individual or association.
3 0
4 years ago
Sheffield Laboratories holds a valuable patent (No. 758-6002-1A) on a precipitator that prevents certain types of air pollution.
vlabodo [156]

Answer:

                        SHEFFIELD LABORATORY

                            PATENT (NO. 78-6002-1A)

Carrying value as at Dec 31

                                      2011                     2015                   2018

Cost                            $182,300           $349,000           $385,000

Amortization             <u> (10,724)   </u>             <u>(79,433)  </u>           <u>(142,403)</u>

                                 <u> 171,576     </u>         <u>   269,567  </u>           <u>242,597</u>

Cost

As at 31 Dec 2011

Design and construction of a prototype                                     $89,000

Testing of models                                                                           40,600

Fees paid engineers and lawyers to prepare application          <u> 52,700</u>

                                                                                                       <u>$182,300</u>

As at 31 Dec 2012

Cost as at Jan 1, 2012                                                                $182,300

Additional cost during the year:

Engineering activity necessary to advance.                           <u> $84,500  </u>

                                                                                                    <u>$266,800</u>

As at 31 Dec 2013

Cost as at Jan 1, 2013                                                                $266,800

Additional cost during the year:

legal fee paid                                                                              <u>$40600  </u>

                                                                                                 <u>   $307,400</u>

As at 31 Dec 2014

Cost as at Jan 1, 2013                                                                $307,400

Additional cost during the year:

Research aimed at modifying the design                                <u>$41,600 </u>

                                                                                                   <u> $349,000</u>

As at 31 Dec 2018

Cost as at Jan 1, 2018                                                                $349,000

Additional cost during the year:

legal fee paid in unseccesful patent infrigement.                   <u>  $36,000  </u>

                                                                                                    <u>$385,000</u>

Amortization for the year    

Dec 31 2011         $182,300/17 =  $10,724

Dec 31 2012

182,300/17                                          10,724

84,500/0                                          <u>      -       </u>

                                                         <u>  10,724</u>

<u />

Dec 31 , 2013 :

  $182,300/17 =  $10,724            

  84,500/16    =      5,281

40,600/0     =     <u>    -  </u>

                         <u>   16,005</u>

Dec 31 2014  =  

$182,300/17 =  $10,724            

  84,500/16    =      5,281

40,600/16     =       2,538

41,600/17      =       <u> 2,447</u>

                         <u>   20,990</u>

Dec 31 2018  =  

$182,300/17 =  $10,724            

  84,500/16    =      5,281

40,600/16     =       2,538

41,600/17      =        2,447

36,000/0     =    <u>       -</u>

                         <u>   20,990</u>

Explanation:

5 0
4 years ago
Complete the following table by indicating whether or not each scenario is an example of price discrimination.
Monica [59]

Answer: yes; no

Explanation:

Price discrimination is an exploitative  selling strategy that  sellers use to try to charge their customers on  different prices for the same product or service.

Last-minute "rush" tickets can be purchased for most Broadway theater shows at a discounted price. They are typically distributed via lottery or on a first-come, first-served basis a few hours before the show. Assume that the theater in question does not hold seats in reserve for this purpose, but rather offers rush tickets only for seats not sold before the day of the performance......... YES PRICE DISCRIMINATION OCCURS

---.>In this case, the groups are  segmented into those who paid earlier at normal price and those who paid in relation to the rush at discounted price, A case  price discrimination arises because the  people who  have paid more than others for a same show, would not be reserved seats which means that  the product was same for the two type of consumers but not the same price

Horizon Wireless offers various features "à la carte" that a customer may add to his or her calling plan, such as a text messaging package, a data package, and an Internet package. NO PRICE DISCRIMINATION

---->This is because Because Horizon Wireless is offering the different features  with  a la carte pricing, where every customer is subject to the same pricing irrespective  of his or her calling plan.

If the price of a data  package or internet  were different for a customer with a more expensive calling plan, then Horizon Wireless might be attempting to identify thier different consumer types and try to  exploit the differences in their willingness to pay.

8 0
3 years ago
A 38-year-old investor places $25,000 into a single premium qualified deferred variable annuity. Twenty years later, with the ac
Bad White [126]

The total tax liability is $12,500.

<h3>What is the total tax liability? </h3>

Due to the fact that the account is qualified annuity, the total amount withdrawn is subject to tax.  Also, because the investor is less than 59.5 years, the investor pays an additional tax of 10%.

The effective total tax = 25% + 10% = 35%

Total tax liability = 25% x $50,000

= 0.25 x $25,000 = $12,500

To learn more about taxes, please check: brainly.com/question/25311567

6 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • The board at Nuance Opticals offers help in providing direction and advice to the​ company, but it possesses no legal responsibi
    9·1 answer
  • When a firm recognizes the critical importance of its employees by attempting to provide good conditions and opportunities, it s
    11·2 answers
  • "After decades of fabulous growth, the trade show industry is experiencing business decline. A report by the National Trade Show
    12·1 answer
  • Adam Smith taught that individual buyers and sellers who act in their own self interest frequently promote​ society's interest.
    7·1 answer
  • If investors receive a 6% interest rate on their bank deposits, what real interest rate will they earn if the inflation rate ove
    15·1 answer
  • Read the sentence.
    13·1 answer
  • This introduces an applicant and the applicant’s résumé to a potential employer: a. Personal Goal Statement b. Cover Letter c. J
    5·2 answers
  • Dante worked 10 hours per week at a grocery store last school year, earning minimum wage. His parents claim him as a dependent o
    10·1 answer
  • For price discrimination via coupons to be successful, it must be TRUE that:
    13·1 answer
  • Each general partner in a limited partnership _______. (choose two correct answers)
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!