1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Kisachek [45]
3 years ago
8

Four more than a number is no more than thirteen

Mathematics
2 answers:
Gemiola [76]3 years ago
8 0
If x+4>13 then it would be x>9
zimovet [89]3 years ago
3 0
Four more than a number = x + 4;
No more than means using < in the equation;
So x+4\ \textgreater \ 13 is your equation.
x+4\ \textgreater \ 13\\&#10;x\ \textgreater \ 9
You might be interested in
Use the triangle to answer the question. What is the value of x?
Black_prince [1.1K]

Answer:

B). 48

Step-by-step explanation:

48•64=3072

3072÷64=48

3 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
If the atomic number is 15 how many protons will it have?
andrey2020 [161]
It will have 15 protons because the atomic number will always equal the number of protons and vice versa
6 0
3 years ago
HELP LAST PROBLEM!
Keith_Richards [23]
Given 4 boxes of pencils cost $5,
Unknown- slope 
$1.25 per box since $5/boxes
Equation y=mx+b
Substitute $1.25/per box for m
Solve y=$1.25x  
The Check
$5=$1.25/per box(4 boxes)
$5=$5
3 0
3 years ago
You bought 7 raffle tickets. A total of 1302 raffle tickets were sold. If every raffle ticket has an equal chance at winning, wh
gayaneshka [121]

Answer:

the probability of not winning is 0.9946

Step-by-step explanation:

The computation of the probability of not winning is shown below:

The Probability of winning is

= 7 ÷ 1302

So, the probability of not winning is

= 1 - 7 ÷ 1302

= (1302 - 7) ÷ 1302

= 1295 ÷ 1302

= 165 ÷ 186

= 0.9946

Hence, the probability of not winning is 0.9946

The same is considered

6 0
3 years ago
1. Kalena was asked to prove ifx(x - 1)(x + 1) = x3 - X represents a polynomial identity. She
Verdich [7]

Answer:

C. Kalena made a mistake in Step 3. The justification should state: -x²

+ x²

Step-by-step explanation:

Given the function x(x - 1)(x + 1) = x3 - X

To justify kelena proof

We will need to show if the two equations are equal.

Starting from the RHS with function x³-x

First we will factor out the common factor which is 'x' to have;

x(x²-1)

Factorising x²-1 using the difference of two square will give;

x(x+1)(x-1)

Note that for two real number a and b, the expansion of a²-b² using difference vof two square will give;

a²-b² = (a+b)(a-b) hence;

Factorising x²-1 using the difference of two square will give;

x(x+1)(x-1)

Factorising x(x+1) gives x²+x, therefore

x(x+1)(x-1) = (x²+x)(x-1)

(x²+x)(x-1) = x³-x²+x²-x

The function x³-x²+x²-x gotten shows that kelena made a mistake in step 3, the justification should be -x²+x² not -x-x²

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • 1/4 of 96= ? without using a fraction
    6·2 answers
  • What is -|-9 -10| +12 (2) divided by 6•2
    6·1 answer
  • The square abcd has side length 10cm. E is the midpoint of BC. Work out the length of DE. Answer to 1 decimal place.
    12·2 answers
  • Triangle that has sides that measure 140, 30, and 10 degrees name.
    14·1 answer
  • Hey can you please help me posted picture of question :)
    5·2 answers
  • At the beginning of the month, Kim had $66.78. Since then, she received three payments of $33.50 from her babysitting job. Kim's
    15·1 answer
  • A) 32 x 3 = 3
    14·1 answer
  • Solve the equation.<br><br> q+59=16<br> Thx!
    12·2 answers
  • Convert the following repeating decimal into a fraction. *<br> 0.497
    10·1 answer
  • THIS IS DUE SOON SO CAN YOU PLEASE HELP?????
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!