1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Blizzard [7]
3 years ago
5

5+(-5)=0 identify the property

Mathematics
1 answer:
Usimov [2.4K]3 years ago
4 0

Answer: Additive Inverse

Step-by-step explanation: The Additive Inverse tells us that if we add

a number and the opposite of that number, the result will be 0.

You might be interested in
For the rational function f(x)= 5x3-x/2x3 , identify any removable discontinuities.
Ierofanga [76]

Answer:

Earlier this month, news broke of progress on this 82-year-old question, thanks to prolific mathematician Terence Tao. And while the story of Tao’s breakthrough is good news, the problem isn’t fully solved.

A refresher on the Collatz Conjecture: It’s all about that function f(n), shown above, which takes even numbers and cuts them in half, while odd numbers get tripled and then added to 1. Take any natural number, apply f, then apply f again and again. You eventually land on 1, for every number we’ve ever checked. The Conjecture is that this is true for all natural numbers.

Tao’s recent work is a near-solution to the Collatz Conjecture in some subtle ways. But his methods most likely can’t be adapted to yield a complete solution to the problem, as he subsequently explained. So we might be working on it for decades longer.

The Conjecture is in the math discipline known as Dynamical Systems, or the study of situations that change over time in semi-predictable ways. It looks like a simple, innocuous question, but that’s what makes it special. Why is such a basic question so hard to answer? It serves as a benchmark for our understanding; once we solve it, then we can proceed to much more complicated matters.

The study of dynamical systems could become more robust than anyone today could imagine. But we’ll need to solve the Collatz Conjecture for the subject to flourish.

Step-by-step explanation:

Earlier this month, news broke of progress on this 82-year-old question, thanks to prolific mathematician Terence Tao. And while the story of Tao’s breakthrough is good news, the problem isn’t fully solved.

A refresher on the Collatz Conjecture: It’s all about that function f(n), shown above, which takes even numbers and cuts them in half, while odd numbers get tripled and then added to 1. Take any natural number, apply f, then apply f again and again. You eventually land on 1, for every number we’ve ever checked. The Conjecture is that this is true for all natural numbers.

Tao’s recent work is a near-solution to the Collatz Conjecture in some subtle ways. But his methods most likely can’t be adapted to yield a complete solution to the problem, as he subsequently explained. So we might be working on it for decades longer.

The Conjecture is in the math discipline known as Dynamical Systems, or the study of situations that change over time in semi-predictable ways. It looks like a simple, innocuous question, but that’s what makes it special. Why is such a basic question so hard to answer? It serves as a benchmark for our understanding; once we solve it, then we can proceed to much more complicated matters.

The study of dynamical systems could become more robust than anyone today could imagine. But we’ll need to solve the Collatz Conjecture for the subject to flourish.Earlier this month, news broke of progress on this 82-year-old question, thanks to prolific mathematician Terence Tao. And while the story of Tao’s breakthrough is good news, the problem isn’t fully solved.

A refresher on the Collatz Conjecture: It’s all about that function f(n), shown above, which takes even numbers and cuts them in half, while odd numbers get tripled and then added to 1. Take any natural number, apply f, then apply f again and again. You eventually land on 1, for every number we’ve ever checked. The Conjecture is that this is true for all natural numbers.

Tao’s recent work is a near-solution to the Collatz Conjecture in some subtle ways. But his methods most likely can’t be adapted to yield a complete solution to the problem, as he subsequently explained. So we might be working on it for decades longer.

The Conjecture is in the math discipline known as Dynamical Systems, or the study of situations that change over time in semi-predictable ways. It looks like a simple, innocuous question, but that’s what makes it special. Why is such a basic question so hard to answer? It serves as a benchmark for our understanding; once we solve it, then we can proceed to much more complicated matters.

The study of dynamical systems could become more robust than anyone today could imagine. But we’ll need to solve the Collatz Conjecture for the subject to flourish.Earlier this month, news broke of progress on this 82-year-old question, thanks to prolific mathematician Terence Tao. And while the story of Tao’s breakthrough is good news, the problem isn’t fully solved.

A refresher on the Collatz Conjecture: It’s all about that function f(n), shown above, which takes even numbers and cuts them in half, while odd numbers get tripled and then added to 1. Take any natural number, apply f, then apply f again and again. You eventually land on 1, for every number we’ve ever checked. The Conjecture is that this is true for all natural numbers.

Tao’s rece

3 0
3 years ago
What is the solution to the equation 1/4x-1/8=7/8+1/2x?<br><br> X=-5<br> X=-4<br> X=4
Rama09 [41]

the answer is x=-4 hope it helps

3 0
3 years ago
What number is 25℅ of 60
9966 [12]
50% is 30, it’s half of 60. 25% is the same as dividing by 4, 60/4 is 15.
7 0
3 years ago
Could u guys please find the area of this shape I am stuck
Alla [95]

Answer: I believe the answer to the question is 208 the way I found this out is that I address the side up and then Then times that by eight and that’s how I got my answer I hope this helps

Step-by-step explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
What is the next number in the pattern? 7,11,10,14,13
nikdorinn [45]
I think the answer is 17 because the pattern adds 4 then takes away 1 so 14-1=13 13+4=17
6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • In the diagram, the areas of ΔADC and ΔDCB are in a ratio of 3 : 4. What are the coordinates of point C?
    10·2 answers
  • PLEASE HELP!!!!! What is the reason for each step in the solution of the equation?
    15·2 answers
  • The scatterplot shows the number of athletes on the field hockey and tennis teams at Southern High School during seven different
    5·2 answers
  • Help please please lol
    12·1 answer
  • What shape is produced when slicing a right rectangular pyramid perpendicular to the base?
    10·2 answers
  • Rationalize the denominators
    5·1 answer
  • Yeah....I have no idea. I tried and apparently I got two wrong answers. ​
    10·2 answers
  • For the question below, identify the population parameter of interest and the sample statistic we might use to estimate the para
    10·1 answer
  • How to solve this. it’s for angles
    11·1 answer
  • Find the largest and smallest whole number when rounded to the nearest hundred to give 1600.​
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!