Answer:
law of diminishing marginal utility i hope this helps<3
Explanation
The correct answer is D. Specific knowledge is excludable, while general knowledge is not excludable.
Explanation:
General knowledge refers to information, facts, etc. that are basic, and due to this, they are known by most of the people. Indeed, general knowledge is obtained through basic education, interaction with others and exposition to media. Moreover, general knowledge covers multiple areas. On the other hand, specific knowledge focuses on specific areas and covers complex facts, information, etc. Also, in most cases, specific knowledge can only be acquired through formal training or education.
Besides, in terms of excludability (quality of a service or product that needs to be paid to be acquired), specific knowledge is mainly excludable because people who do not pay for formal training cannot obtain it. On the opposite, general knowledge is not excludable as this can be obtained for free, and therefore it is not possible to control this (Option D).
I believe that the best answer among the choices provided by the question is <span> C. Some have absolute power, and some have limited power.</span>
Hope my answer would be a great help for you. If you have more questions feel free to ask here at Brainly.
Salvatore's behavior is consistent with socio-emotional selectivity theory
.
<h3><u>Explanation:</u></h3>
The theory that recognizes the change in terms of cognitive influence especially as one age. It maintains that with age people become selective and they tend to invest in goals and activities that nurture their emotional well-being. As people age, they prefer positivity instead of negative information.
Being selective and narrowing social interactions improves "positive emotional experiences" and decreases negative experiences. Furthermore, the theory also recognizes that goals as one age tend to lean towards gaining more knowledge, career planning and others that will have a positive impact in the future.
Gilligan started instructing at Harvard in 1967 with eminent clinician Erik Erikson. In 1970 she turned into an examination right hand for Lawrence Kohlberg. Kohlberg is known for his examination of moral improvement and his stage hypothesis of good advancement, equity, and rights.
Lawrence Kohlberg developed the before work of intellectual scholar Jean Piaget to clarify the ethical improvement of kids, which he accepted takes after a progression of stages. Kohlberg characterized three levels of good advancement: pre-conventional, regular, and post-conventional. Each level has two particular stages.
