Answer:
The Harappans used clay and mud to make <u>fired bricks</u>
Explanation:
Answer:
1. used natural resources in every aspect of their lives. They used animal skins (deerskin) as clothing. Shelter was made from the material around them (saplings, leaves, small branches, animal fur). Native peoples of the past farmed, hunted, and fished.
2. American Indians did not always have the bow and arrow. It was not until about A.D. 500 that the bow and arrow was adopted in Iowa some 11,500 years after the first people came to the region. Primary benefits of the bow and arrow over the spear are more rapid missile velocity, higher degree of accuracy, and greater mobility. Arrowheads also required substantially less raw materials than spear heads. A flint k napper could produce a large number of small projectile points from a single piece of chert. Even with the gun's many advantages in the historic era, bows and arrows are much quieter than guns, allowing the hunter more chances to strike at the prey.
Thunderstorms usually occur at cold fronts.
<u>Answer:</u>
The options that violates the principles of Piaget's theory are
- if a gifted child skipped the concrete operational stage and went directly to the formal operational stage
- if a child went through a revolutionary change of thought at 2 years of age
<u>Explanation:</u>
According to Piaget, all four stages must be successfully completed in order to attain full human intelligence. None of the stages can be skipped and the term "gifted" itself would violate Piaget's idea that intelligence must be gained over time due to biological maturation and interaction with the surroundings. All children will learn and develop as the stages pass. Also, a child who is just two years old would have learned to understand and control only his sensorimotor functions. The thought process of a two year old child isn't developed enough to undergo a drastic revolution.
I'm assuming these are the options.
<span>enforcing state laws <--- Is your answer.
representing the state in the U.S. Congress
revising the state constitution
deciding on state criminal cases</span>
