Answer:
$855,903.20
Explanation:
Real discounting rate=> i= [i'-f]/[1+f]. Where i is the real interest rate. i' is the nominal interest rate which is given as 5% and f is the rate of inflation
i = (5%-3%)/1+3%)
i = 2/1.3
i = 1.94%
Her after tax earnings = 45,000*(1-0.15) = $38,250
Personal consumption = 25% of this, 38,250*0.75 = $28,688.
We are discounting her earnings back 45 years at 1.94%. The equation will be: 28,688 * {1-(1+0.01940)^-45} / {0.01940}
= 28,688 * {1 - 0.42120322099] / 0.01940
= 28,688 * 29.83488551597938
= 855903.1956824165
= $855,903.20
So, the amount of life insurance necessary for Jenny using the Human Life Value method is $855,903.20
Answer:
The correct options are "A, C, and D".
Explanation:
- GAAP becomes regarded as a relatively 'rules-based' management framework, seems to be the accounting technique used throughout the United States
- IFRS becomes quite 'principles-based', although this would be the accounting framework used in more than 110 countries throughout the globe.
- These allow the same approach being used for international and domestic section reporting, which generate reconciliation issues.
Answer:
the difference between the price that sellers receive and the price that buyers pay, resulting from a subsidy government cheese.
Explanation:
In Economics, subsidy can be defined as the amount of money or benefits such as tax reduction given by the government to sellers in order to sustain production and enable the buy to continuously purchase the product.
A subsidy wedge can be defined as the difference between the price that sellers receive and the price that buyers pay, resulting from a subsidy government cheese.
Answer:
1 m/s2
Explanation:
The force on a body ( which is a pull or push) is given by the formula
F = Ma
where F is the force, a is the acceleration and M the mass of the body
Therefore, given that the same force is applied to both bodies,
0.058 × 10 = 0.58 × a
a = 0.058 × 10/0.58
a = 1 m/s2
The acceleration of the basketball will be 1 m/s2.
Answer:
C. VL = VU + PV(Tax Shield) - PV(CFD)
Explanation:
The static trade off theory is a theory of capital structure in corporate finance, first proposed by Alan Kraus and Robert H. Litzenberger. The theory emphasizes the trade-offs between the tax benefits of increasing leverage and the cost of bankruptcy associated with higher leverage. The <u>answer is C</u> as we know relative to the unleveraged firm, leverage provides both costs and benefits. The benefits are the tax shields provided by debt.
