Because of the mayflower compact, they were in search for a new world.
Political scientists have generally found that justices' decisions are most closely tied to<u> </u><u>their political ideologies.</u>
It is a frequent misconception that Supreme Court justices' voting decisions primarily reflect their beliefs, principles, or personal policy preferences.
However, this supposition has never been sufficiently verified using objective assessments of the ideological beliefs of the justices, that is, assessments that are not based on their votes on the Court.
We derive independent and trustworthy measures of the values of every Supreme Court justice from Earl Warren to Anthony Kennedy using content analytic approaches.
The attitudinal paradigm is firmly supported by the close correlation between these values and the justices' votes.
To learn more about Political Scientists here
brainly.com/question/10369837
#SPJ4
Answer:
Common
Explanation:
Common law is a set of laws established by judicial authorities based on past events. These are informal unwritten laws that courts are allowed to use if similar case arises. So decision can be taken based on precedent.
This is used if existing written laws are not enough to decide the fate of a case. It is at the discretion of the judge to interpret the precedent and apply in the current situation.
It's something that animals can just do. They don't have to learn them.
Answer:
Being parked too close to a fire engine that is also running
Explanation: