Answer:
-lack of clarity and consistency of national objectives and standards.
-complex and inflexible approval processes.
I can think of one advantage: if this party wins, it will have a majority in the parliament and senate, so it will be have more power and would not have to negotiate every voting with the other party in the coalition.
In a multiple party when coalitions , the smaller party in the coalition usually gets proportionately much more power because it can "blackmail" the bigger partner; this often stalls the voting process.
Dhxhdbhdh. Hbducncudbcnfi n find idbcidhndidndjcndbcixndcidnchgxbchcubdu u h bífida de if con inch if bf g he c if bf iufbcjchcjcubfuc yhbknhj
<h2>
The following were the challenges faced by North Carolina’s banking system in the early 1800s:
</h2><h2>
</h2><h3><u>
There was too much paper currency -
</u></h3>
The paper currency that was in circulation, which was actually a promissory note, had become a very common method of payment.
The problem of the storage and reciprocation of this currency had already started to become a huge problem.
<h3><u>
Rural areas did not have many banks -
</u></h3>
Though substantially large populations also lived in the rural areas, the network of banks had not yet reached rural areas. As a result, a large faction of the population was being left out of the banking system.
<h3><u>
Bartering and trading were very common -
</u></h3>
Though the system of paper money had bee introduced already, many people still continued to use the same old bartering system in which the exchanged commodities for commodities.
Are there multiple choices?