Answer:A representative who votes in accordance with the wishes of his or her constituency is acting as an INSTRUCTED DELEGATE.
one who pursues the best national interest, regardless of public opinion in his or her constituency, is acting as a TRUSTEE.
Explanation:
In political representation, an instructed delegate is the person who is chosen to represent or act on behalf of the district that has elected them.A trustee acts on their own logical personal
judgement for the good of everyone in their nation.
The instructed delegate represent parties with conflict of interest whilst trusteed represent parties within a particular nation or province or state Delegates act according to the instructions given to them by their constituents.
They follow order given to them by constituents even when casting the votes eventhough they may not agree with the part to which they cast their vote but their personal opinions do not apply. Such as delegates in the United Nations will cast their votes according to the instructions made by the president.
Trustees use their own personal logic and analysis to vote. They present a particular nation they act on the benefits of everyone , with one goal in mind that is shared amongst that nation or state.
Answer:
Many Reasons!!!
Explanation:
Cars or Vehicles in General provide easier transportation to individuals while also creating jobs as well, such as; mechanics, car washes, marketing items for vehicle products. It also created Industries such as Ford, Chevy, Dodge, and many more which is a provider to many jobs. It also makes traveling easier and relocating to new areas much simpler than it was before.
Answer:
Not understandable. What?
Answer:
Today, the presidency has dominant force in national policy formation, not all domestic policy springs from the White House but none is made without the involvement of the president, when it relates to foreign policy and, security policy, there can be little doubt about presidential primacy. Congress retains the constitutional power to declare war, but the power has not been exercised in sixty-five years. During this period American military forces have been engaged in numerous conflicts all over the world at the instruction of the president.It is a fact that presidential power has expanded exponentially over time.The extent of this growth, however, is not fully valued. At the time of framing, Madison, among others, believed the legislature was the most powerful branch, and as a result, he encouraged the creation of a bicameral legislature. Congress was required to be divided into two branches so that it would not engulf the other branches. The executive needed to be unitary to ensure it is not weakened in its clash with the legislature. Two hundred years later, any suggestion that Congress is twice as powerful as the executive would be deemed absurd. Particularly in the areas of national security and foreign affairs, the Presidency has become the far more pwerful. The position of Presidency has become too powerful in the areas of national security and foreign affairs.
Imperial Presidency is a term used to describe the moderm presidency of the USA which became popular i the 1960's and it refers to a U.S. presidency that is characterized by greater power than the Constitution allows.
Theodore Roosevelt and Woodrow Wilson each expanded the powers of the presidency. Roosevelt worked closely with Congress, sending it messages defining his legislative powers. He also took the lead in developing the international power of the United States.
The advantage of increasing presidential power are
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
The three examples to defend my answer would be the following.
1) It is true that the goal of the juvenile court system is to rehabilitate adolescents so they have the opportunity to become responsible citizens when they are adults. However, not always rehabilitation or punishment is the best approach for handling juvenile offenders. Why? Because oftentimes these approaches only focus on the consequences, on the solutions. And this approach is limited.
2) To improve the quality of the response, the government has to go to the origins of the problems. Yes, what is the situation that is generating criminal conduct. Is it poverty? Is it the gang's influence in the neighborhood? Is it family violence? Is it a lack of education? There would be many reasons.
So it is of the utmost importance to understand the origin, the real cause of the problem because if not, the solution would still be incomplete.
3) Once the real cause of the problem has been identified, the government or other social groups could create better solutions that are not limited to punishment or rehabilitation. What I propose is to create better social programs that grant education for most American families, allow the opportunity for better jobs, attend the problem of child abuse in the families so children do not grow with traumas, and better athletic or sports programs to invite youngsters to practice sports instead of joining gangs.