<span>Assuming that this is referring to the same list of options that was posted before with this question, <span>the correct response would be that they both believed in the "social contract," since this was an Enlightenment principle that allowed people to overthrow their government if that government became tyrannical. </span></span>
Answer:
I would try to reason with the people, cut back on the lavish lifestyle and put that money towards the common people. Obviously like and monarch I would want to stay in my position of power, but I would try to learn to use my power and wealth for good rather than live a life of luxury while the people of my nation suffer. The French revolution was in a way a good thing to happen for what was going on, but it very well could have been avoided if the monarch had just listened.
Monarchs shouldn't give huge amount of power, and if they are it needs to still be regulated on what they can and cannot do.
Explanation:
Answer:
<h3>According to Delbriuck, the UN. has become a global actor with a meaningful role to play in the process of globalization. It should serve as a forum for the determination of international public interest, promote the participation of nonstate actors, and work to expand and reshape the international legal framework.</h3>
Answer:True
Explanation:It just is a helpful situation
