Supplies expense is $11,400.00.
Expenses = Beg Inv + Addl Inv - Remaining
= 5,100 + 12,400 - 6,100
= 11,400
Answer:
The accounts receivable balance at the beginning of the third quarter is $3,550
Explanation:
For computing the account receivable balance, first, we have to compute the credit sale per day, and then multiply with the number of days
In mathematically,
Credit sale per day = (Estimated second Quarter Sales) ÷ (accounts receivable period up to second quarter)
= $7,100 ÷ 90 days
= 78.89
Now the account receivable balance equals to
= Credit sales per day × accounts receivable period
= 78.89 days × 45 days
= $3550
Since the question is asking about the beginning of the third quarter so we considered second quarter sales
Answer:
Compounding formula would be used here which is as under:
Future Value = Present value * (1+r)^n
FV = (PV is $2000) * ( 1 + 4%)^ 3 number of years
Remember that r is the return that is 4% that Sarah Jones will receive.
So
FV = $2250
So this is the amount that she will receive after three years. I would recommend her to invest in ordinary shares (take higher risk for higher return) so that she is able to buy a better car.
Answer: Consumer share risk with company.
Explanation:
Insurance involves the sharing of risk between a client and his insurer. In insurance the insurer takes a large portion of the risk while the client covers the rest of risk payment.
Answer:
First we need to first find the equilibrium quantity and price during normal times.
The equilibrium price in normal times is P=$3 and the equilibrium quantity is 55 bottles.
During the hurricane, the government will set a price ceiling of $3. We can infer from the table that the quantity supplied at P=$3 is 55 bottles while the quantity demanded during hurricane at the price of $3 per bottle is 105 bottles. Hence,
105-55= 50
During a hurricane, there would be a shortage of 50 bottles of water.
If there were no price ceiling, then the equilibrium price would be such that the quantity demanded during hurricane equals the quantity supplied. From the table we can see that the equilibrium price would in that case be P=$5 per bottle where the equilibrium quantity is 85 bottles. With the price ceiling only 55 bottles are available for trading. Now without the price ceiling 85 bottles are available.
Hence consumers would have to pay an additional $2 (=5-3) but they can now buy an additional 30 bottles [=85-55].
Without the antiprice gouging law, consumers would have to pay $2 more than the ceiling price, but they would bv able to buy 30 more bottles of water.
