1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Damm [24]
3 years ago
8

Why were the American colonists so upset about the practice of “taxation without representation?”

Social Studies
1 answer:
vagabundo [1.1K]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

A

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Which event immediately followed the storming of the bastille? peasants began attacking the aristocracy. louis xvi stepped down.
Vlada [557]
Peasants began attacking the aristocracy<span />
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The philosopher who constructed his great work politics combined descriptive and normative approaches to the study of politics i
Debora [2.8K]

The philosopher responsible of constructing great work politics in combination with descriptive and normative approaches in regards of studying politics is Aristotle. He is considered to be a Greek philosopher during their time and was able to make contributions in different areas such as politics, mathematics, logic and many more.

7 0
3 years ago
The person who submits an application for insurance is always referred to as the _______.
Ipatiy [6.2K]

Answer:

A person who submits an application for insurance is always known to as an INSURED or POLICY HANDLER.

7 0
3 years ago
Leanne is 10 months old. chastity is 13 months old. dominique is 16 months old. which infant should show the most evidence of se
SCORPION-xisa [38]
Separation anxiety refers to fear or anxiety about being separated from home or someone important to the child (parents usually).
Separation anxiety symptoms usually peak between eight and fourteen months of age, decreasing usually after two years of age. So, it can be either Leanne or chastity ( there is no link that says younger will have more anxiety or viceversa).


5 0
3 years ago
In explaining how a person can enter a social contract and be obliged to the laws of civil society, locke invokes the notion of
marissa [1.9K]

In explaining how a person can enter a social contract and be obliged

to the laws of civil society, Locke invokes the notion of "tacit consent." Rawls, who is also a "social contract theorist," of sorts, argues that a social contract can arise only from "hypothetical consent." What is the difference between Locke's notion of tacit consent and Rawls's notion of hypothetical consent?

a) Tacit consent requires actually expressing one's consent to the terms of the contract, whereas hypothetical consent simply requires that a citizen would have given consent under certain ideal conditions.

b) One who gives tacit consent implies consent to the terms of the contract through her actions, whereas someone who gives hypothetical consent offers her explicit word on the basis of her particular desires.

c) One who gives tacit consent implicitly suggests, through her actions, that she accepts the terms of the contract, whereas to say that someone hypothetically consents means that she would have consented to the terms of the contract were she asked to do so under certain ideal conditions.

d) Tacit consent is consent given in the state of nature, whereas hypothetical consent occurs within an ideal society.

e) Tacit consent is consent given by any rational agent, irrespective of her particular desires or ends, whereas someone who gives hypothetical consent agrees to the terms of the contract based on some particular desire that she has.

Answer:

c) One who gives tacit consent implicitly suggests, through her actions, that she accepts the terms of the contract, whereas to say that someone hypothetically consents means that she would have consented to the terms of the contract were she asked to do so under certain ideal conditions.

Explanation:

The major difference between Locke's notion of tacit consent and Rawl's notion of hypothetical consent is that unlike tacit consent, someone that hypothetically consents means that the person would have likely consented to the terms of the contract if she was asked to do so under certain ideal conditions.

Tacit consent involves implicitly suggesting through actions that she accepts the terms of the contract.

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Alan rosenberg describes the relationship between actors and directors as similar to a marriage—it can be good, but sometimes it
    12·1 answer
  • __________ damages are small amount of money given to recognize that a defendant did indeed commit a tort in a case in which the
    13·2 answers
  • Fact Pattern 28-1B. Chocolate! Chocolate! Corporation is a new company that needs to borrow money to meet its payroll. Dayna, pr
    10·1 answer
  • The Three-Fifths Compromise addressed which problem?
    14·1 answer
  • What does the small raised number at the end of the passage mean
    8·1 answer
  • Incidents typically begin and end locally and are managed on a daily basis at the lowest possible geographical, organizational,
    14·1 answer
  • What was George Washington’s foreign policy?
    7·1 answer
  • How did living in company towns make union membership more difficult for workers?
    5·2 answers
  • Hello i need help on thus ​
    9·2 answers
  • It is anticipated that in 2050, roughly 32 percent of children in the United States will have a Latino ethnic identity. What was
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!