Hi there!
The correct answer to your question is C.
I hope this helps!
Brady
It was basically set up like a mass assembly line in the monastery and was called a scriptorium.
Answer: Option D
<u>Explanation:</u><u>
</u>
In ancient times the writings were done in clay tablets and then was done in wax and then on the papyrus or paper. In Monastery there was a place called as the scriptorium where the scripts were written and stored. The Scriptorium was the place where they copied, wrote, maintained manuscripts. The monks working there as scribes would script it and arrange it in a mass assembly line style.
Each scriptorium had a director who was a provisioner who provided materials and checked the copying process. It was also a custom followed that the monks were asked to write at least for an hour.
Answer:
Enlightenment changed people's ideas about government. People questioned: Are people born with special rights that must be respected?
Should citizens have more say in what their govt. does?
Does the people have the right to overthrow an unjust govt?
Explanation:
The Glorious Revolution ended the Dominion of New England in 1689
English Bill of Rights provided a model or representative govt.
Both ideas supported the idea that citizens have rights that the govt. must respect.
<u>Enlightenment ideas:</u>
Locke argued people are born with <u>natural rights</u>
Locke and Rousseau wrote that the govt. was based on <u>social contracts</u> with citizens.
Montesquieu supported <u>separation of powers</u> between different branches in a representative govt.
Voltaire argued for <u>religious tolerance</u> of all faiths.
Answer: D. Armenians
Explanation: Tamaz V. Gamkrelidze and Vyacheslav Ivanov proposed the Armenian speculation. The Armenian theory recommends that Proto-Indo-European was talked in Eastern Anatolia, Southern Caucasus and Northern Mesopotamia which are situated in the fringes of Europe and parts of Asia. It shows the general population went from Proto-Indo-European country to other neighboring parts of the world.
IN MY POINT OF VIEW andrew was not happy about the supreme courts decision because he felt against there ways
