The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although there are no options attached, we can say the following.
The basic guideline in writing a title that is being considered when the researcher should not use any unfamiliar and hard to understand words to avoid confusion to the readers is that the research uses a comprehensive and clear title to prevent any confusion.
The title has to clearly express the purpose of the paper and be so interesting that people indeed want to read it. The researcher has to have in mind that the title should include the tone of the writing and it has to include keywords to facilitate the search if someone tries to look for the paper on the internet. It is as well as important to discard any useless word or jargon, slangs, and unnecessary ideas that are not well suited in the title.
The observational method is one of the most used in the social sciences and has some curious aspects. On the one hand, it can be considered as the most primitive and, consequently, the most imprecise.
Documentary method is a type of research that uses primary sources, that is, data and information that have not yet been treated scientifically or analytically. Documentary research has specific objectives and can be a rich complement to bibliographic research.
The analyzed documents can be current or old, and can be used for historical, cultural, social and economic context of a place or group of people, at a certain moment in history. For this reason, it is a type of research widely used in the social and human sciences.
- children's play in schools (<u>situation</u>)
In the observational method, these games will be closely analyzed so that we can survey the information gathered from the observation of these children playing in schools.
In the documentary method, qualitative analyzes will be made about the given phenomenon, and it is also possible to make quantitative analyzes, when analyzing databases with numerical information
The Federalists felt that this addition wasn't necessary, because they believed that the Constitution as it stood only limited the government not the people.
