What is the difference between explicit collusion and implicit collusion? Unlike explicit collusion, implicit collusion

Business

1 answer:

lesya [120]4 years ago

4 0

Answer:

The basic difference between both are explained below.

Explanation:

Explicit collusion is where firms meet and agree to charge the same price, and an example of implicit collusion is price leadership. Unlike explicit collusion, implicit collusion unlike explicit collusion, implicit collusion is where firms signal to each other without actually meeting and agreeing to charge the same price.

Unlike explicit collusion, wherever the occurrence of an accommodation that would lend ammunition for an antitrust court case might be unscrewed, implied collusion is challenging to document as well as to verify. Implicit collusion frequently seems to be nothing more than all firms individually responding to shifting market circumstances.

You might be interested in

6. Suppose that the returns on the stock fund presented in Spreadsheet 6.1 were 240%, 214%, 17%, and 33% in the four scenarios.

Basile [38]

Answer:

Explanation:

Base on the scenario been described in the question, stock variance refers to the volatility that arises from the average. Volatility shows the degree of risk that will be helpful in determining the level of risk an investor should take while purchasing a particular security.

5 0

3 years ago

National defense is a good that is nonexcludable and nonrival in consumption. Suppose that instead of national defense being pai

ElenaW [278]

Answer:

Explanation:

find the attached document below

3 0

3 years ago

Assume for Guatemala that the domestic price of coffee without international trade is higher than the world price of coffee. Thi

Marina CMI [18]

Answer:

other countries have a comparative advantage over Guatemala in the production of coffee, and Guatemala will import coffee.

Explanation:

This question is incomplete. Please check the attached image for a complete question.

A country has comparative advantage in the production of a good or service If it produces the good or service at a lower opportunity cost when compared to its trading partners.

The price of Guatemala's coffee is higher when compared to the world price of coffee without international trade. It shows that Guatemala doesn't have a comparative advantage in the production of coffee. Guatemala should stop producing coffee and import instead. This would enable Guatemala focus more resocurces on the production of good for which it has comparative advantage.

I hope my answer helps you