What is the difference between explicit collusion and implicit collusion? Unlike explicit collusion, implicit collusion

Business

1 answer:

lesya [120]3 years ago

4 0

Answer:

The basic difference between both are explained below.

Explanation:

Explicit collusion is where firms meet and agree to charge the same price, and an example of implicit collusion is price leadership. Unlike explicit collusion, implicit collusion unlike explicit collusion, implicit collusion is where firms signal to each other without actually meeting and agreeing to charge the same price.

Unlike explicit collusion, wherever the occurrence of an accommodation that would lend ammunition for an antitrust court case might be unscrewed, implied collusion is challenging to document as well as to verify. Implicit collusion frequently seems to be nothing more than all firms individually responding to shifting market circumstances.

You might be interested in

Your parents surprise you with a $500 check. as a result, the u.s. gdp decreases because you have to pay taxes on this income. r

Sidana [21]

I believe that the $500 cheque from your parents has already been counted when it was earned and therefore would neither increase or decrease GDP. GDP is defined basically as a bulk measure of production that is equal to the sum of all gross values of all units involved in production.

3 0

3 years ago

Marlena, the human resource manager, is putting together a package describing the new job opportunity available at her company.

astra-53 [7]

Answer:

Job analysis

Explanation:

6 0

2 years ago

Starbucks is owns and operates most of its retail outlets; mcdonalds franchises most of its retail outlets. an advantage of fran

Sergeeva-Olga [200]

Go to hw is hard .com

6 0

3 years ago

___________ started the profession of advertising in the u.s. by using newspaper advertisements.

jenyasd209 [6]

I think it was Francis Ayer

3 0

3 years ago

If a firm increases its dividend payout rate the: firm will have less cash available for new investment. Unselected firmâ€™s sto

KengaRu [80]

Answer:

1. If a firm increases its dividend payout rate the: firm will have less cash available for new investment. True

2. Stock price will likely fall by the same percentage. False

3. Retention ratio will rise at the same rate. False

Explanation:

1. If a firm increases its dividend payout rate the: firm will have less cash available for new investment. This assertion is true because the company would be paying out a larger portion of earnings as dividends, hence the balance portion for new investment will be lower as a result.

2. Stock price will likely fall by the same percentage. This assertion is most unlikely because normally, if a particular stock is paying higher dividends investors will have high expectation and be willing to pay a higher price to buy a stock that pays high dividends

3. Retention ratio will rise at the same rate. This conclusion is also incorrect because pay out ratio and retention ratio have an inverse relationship. If more dividend is paid out, then less money is retained.

3 0

3 years ago

What is the difference between explicit collusion and implicit​ collusion? Unlike explicit​ collusion, implicit collusion

What is the difference between explicit collusion and implicit collusion? Unlike explicit collusion, implicit collusion