Answer:
judicial activism
Explanation:
Based on the information provided within the question it can be said that in this scenario this decision is an example of judicial activism. This term refers to a court ruling that is suspected of having been made on the basis of a personal opinion as opposed to an actual existing law. Such as in this case since the court made a ruling on something that is not not explicitly mentioned in the Constitution.
The best thing that Raven can do to position such a diverse team that comes from different departments for success is to b. acknowledge that people bring different values and perspectives and encourage them to speak openly.
<h3>Why should Raven acknowledge diversity?</h3>
There is strength in diversity because the different people will be able to bring unique things to the table.
Encouraging them to speak freely on these things will allow for the team to develop multiple ways of dealing with things which will increase their chances of success.
In conclusion, option B is correct.
Find out more on diversity at brainly.com/question/4697836.
Answer:
The Morrill Land-Grant Acts are statutes that allowed for the creation of land-grant colleges in U.S. states using proceeds of federal land sales. The Morrill Act of 1862 was enacted during the American Civil War and the Morrill Act of 1890 expanded it. This would be a good move on the government, because granted revenues from the sale of millions of acres of federal lands to states in order to create higher education institutions. This is a positive on the economy and education. :)
