Answer: 4. A lawyer
A lawyer would most likely hold a state in the Texas legislature
Answer:
Compromises and Act.
Explanation:
The compromises and Act were related to the question of slavery. The South relied on agriculture and took the slavery system as legal to generate wealth. Whereas the North were against the practice of slavery they considered it evil because it bound people to their masters without having rights and freedom.
Missouri Compromise became the first compromise related to slavery. The Compromise established Missouri as a slave and Maine as a free state. The purpose of the compromise was to maintain the balance of power in the Senate.
The westward migration in California led the government to introduce the compromise of 1850. The Compromise of 1850 reduced the political dispute over slavery in new territories after the Mexican-American War.
The Kansas-Nebraska Act passed by the government in 1854. It allowed Kansas and Nebraska to decide whether to allow slavery or not.
Answer:
more violent than in Nigeria.
Explanation:
Both Kenya and Nigeria did not possess one uniting body that gained the most support from the people to obtain power after the War for independence.
Because of this, power vacuum was created win both countries that lead to several violent battles between different groups who want to take the power.
But In Kenya, there was one particular group that stood up because of the use of violent methods to compete for the power. It's called the Mau Mau. The Mau Mau did not hesitate to kill Kenyan citizens who refused to join their ranks and killed ten of thousands civilians in the process.
Answer:
D. Equal protection
Explanation:
This treatment was guaranteed by the 14th amendment of the United States constitution, specifically under the Equal Protection clause.
This clause statement that the government shall not impose different treatment to citizens, regardless of their Race, Gender, Eternities, or religion. This give the right for the defendants who can prove that they've been mistreated by the court to sue the state where the trial was being held.
