How does the strong history of immigration in the United States influence the kind of nation we have become? Since most American
s are descendants of immigrants, why do you think discrimination against today's immigrants persists? Do you think immigration should be restricted, or that it should be available to anyone who wants to move to America? WRITE A FEW TO 5 SENTENCES I NEED 2 ANSWERS TO GIVE BRAINLIEST ANSWER THANKS!!!
Immigration should not be restricted, Americans today have struggled to understand the concept of accepting everyone, people need to really let go, granted, over time many people have grown to accept other races, but it will never be something that everyone accepts.
There was not a hard cutoff, but there has been a severe attitude shift.
In the former attitude, the immigrants moved to America to be Americans, retaining some of their culture, but mostly learning to accept other cultures and associate with other cultures. We called this idea "The Meltingpot".
In the more current attitude, the immigrants move to America to be themselves in an American Environment, retaining most of their culture and substantially failing to mix with other cultures. We call this idea "The Mosaic". The fallacy, here, is in the failure to recognize that the Meltingpot is what created the American Environment.
I do not know how to restructure Immigration Policy so that Meltingpot candidates can come easily and Mosaic candidates can go where they will be happier.
These are my views based on a little thought on the matter. I could be persuaded to hold a different attitude, given the presentation of compelling evidence to the contrary.
This example best illustrates the CULTURAL DETERMINANTS OF SCHEMAS. Cultural determinant of shcemas is the term which explains the familiar and the pre-acquainted knowledge that one uses when dealing with a familiar situation that involves one's culture. Cultural schemas are cognitive structures that contain knowledge for face to face interactions in one's cultural environment.
The correct answer for this question is "TRUE." The legal means to secure the presence of a nonparty witness for deposition is known as a notice of intent to take oral deposition. This statement is true as far as the legal means in securing the presence of a nonparty witness is concerned.
B.F Skinner's operant conditioning explains how the rewards and punishments increase or decrease the likelihood of repetition of a particular behavior. According to this theory, learning occurs through an association between a behavior and its consequence. A reward given for a particular behavior would act as a reinforcement for that behavior in the future. As per the question when the kid Gets a candy for tantrums at the counter it will increase the chances of repetition of that behavior in the future.
Being that they are the one to cater for the kid, they hold the sole decision to make whether they can cope and take care of the kids should the chance when conceived fall within the stated 75%
