1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
ruslelena [56]
3 years ago
8

Verify that the function u(x, y, z) = log x^2 + y^2 is a solution of the two dimensional Laplace equation u_xx + u_yy = 0 everyw

here, except of course at the origin where f is not defined. Verify that the following functions solve the wave equation, u_tt = u_xx u(x, t) = cos(4x) cos(4t) u(x, t) = f(x - t) + f(x + 1), where f is any differentiable function of one variable.
Mathematics
1 answer:
Daniel [21]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

The function  u(x,y,z)=log ( x^{2} +y^{2}) is indeed a solution of the two dimensional Laplace equation  u_{xx} +u_{yy} =0.

The wave equation  u_{tt} =u_{xx} is satisfied by the function u(x,t)=cos(4x)cos(4t) but not by the function u(x,t)=f(x-t)+f(x+1).

Step-by-step explanation:

To verify that the function  u(x,y,z)=log ( x^{2} +y^{2}) is a solution of the 2D Laplace equation we calculate the second partial derivative with respect to x and then with respect to t.

u_{xx}=\frac{2}{ln(10)}((x^{2} +y^{2})^{-1} -2x^{2} (x^{2} +y^{2})^{-2})

u_{yy}=\frac{2}{ln(10)}((x^{2} +y^{2})^{-1} -2y^{2} (x^{2} +y^{2})^{-2})

then we introduce it in the equation  u_{xx} +u_{yy} =0

we get that  \frac{2}{ln(10)} (\frac{2}{(x^{2}+y^{2}) } - \frac{2}{(x^{2}+y^{2} ) } )=0

To see if the functions 1) u(x,t)=cos(4x)cos(4t) and 2)    u(x,t)=f(x-t)+f(x+1) solve the wave equation we have to calculate the second partial derivative with respect to x and the with respect to t for each function. Then we see if they are equal.

1)  u_{xx}=-16 cos (4x) cos (4t)

   u_{tt}=-16cos(4x)cos(4t)

we see for the above expressions that  u_{tt} =u_{xx}

2) with this function we will have to use the chain rule

 If we call  s=x-t and  w=x+1  then we have that

 u(x,t)=f(x-t)+f(x+1)=f(s)+f(w)

So  \frac{\partial u}{\partial x}=\frac{df}{ds}\frac{\partial s}{\partial x} +\frac{df}{dw} \frac{\partial w}{\partial x}

because we have  \frac{\partial s}{\partial x} =1 and   \frac{\partial w}{\partial x} =1

then  \frac{\partial u}{\partial x} =f'(s)+f'(w)

⇒ \frac{\partial^{2} u }{\partial x^{2} } =\frac{\partial}{\partial x} (f'(s))+ \frac{\partial}{\partial x} (f'(w))

⇒\frac{\partial^{2} u }{ \partial x^{2} } =\frac{d}{ds} (f'(s))\frac{\partial s}{\partial x} +\frac{d}{ds} (f'(w))\frac{\partial w}{\partial x}

⇒ \frac{\partial^{2} u }{ \partial x^{2} } =f''(s)+f''(w)

Regarding the derivatives with respect to time

\frac{\partial u}{\partial t}=\frac{df}{ds} \frac{\partial s}{\partial t}+\frac{df}{dw} \frac{\partial w}{\partial t}=-\frac{df}{ds} =-f'(s)

then  \frac{\partial^{2} u }{\partial t^{2} } =\frac{\partial}{\partial t} (-f'(s))=-\frac{d}{ds} (f'(s))\frac{\partial s}{\partial t} =f''(s)

we see that  \frac{\partial^{2} u }{ \partial x^{2} } =f''(s)+f''(w) \neq f''(s)=\frac{\partial^{2} u }{\partial t^{2} }

u(x,t)=f(x-t)+f(x+1)  doesn´t satisfy the wave equation.

You might be interested in
Consider the following system of equations, <br> ​ −2x−9y=12−2x−7y=8 <br> ​The value of x is
joja [24]

The value of x is 23 and the value of y is -6

x = 23

y = -6

You're welcome.

6 0
3 years ago
Does anyone know how to do this?
babunello [35]

Answer:

1)X+4=2x-17+10

X. =2x-7-4

11=X

DF=11+4

=15

2)FH~

11x+71=12x+32

12x-11x =71-32

X=39

FH=(11×39)+71+(12×39)+32

=1000

3)57+39+8x-12=180

8x+84-84=180-84

8x=96

X=12

4)11x+2=68

11x=66

X=6

5)114+X+37+X=139

2x+151. -151=139-151

X=-6

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What is the surface area?<br> 9 ft<br> 6 ft<br> 3 ft<br> square feet
Vlada [557]

Answer:

the answer to this question is equal to 162

4 0
3 years ago
Solve 4 - 2(-5a - 10)=30 and justify each step
Sergeeva-Olga [200]
First you would do parenthesis according to the PEMDAS(Parenthesis, Exponents, Multiply, Divide, Add, Subtract) Rule

4 -2(-5a -10) = 30

4 + 10a + 20 = 30

Now you need to add 4 and 20 because they are on the same side

24 + 10a = 30

Now subtract 24 on both sides

24 + 10a = 30

-24. -24


10a = 6

Last divide 10 from both sides


10a/10. = 6/10

a= 6/10

Last simplify (optional but recommended)

a = 3/5 or 0.6


Hope this helped :)


A = 0.6
5 0
3 years ago
Which of the following represents the solution of Three-halves = StartFraction 3 Over 2 x EndFraction minus StartFraction 6 Over
hichkok12 [17]

Answer:

x = one-fifth

Step-by-step explanation:

3(½) = 3/(2x) - 6/(5x)

LCM is 10x

3/2 = [3(5) - 6(2)]/(10x)

10x × 3/2 = 3

15x = 3

x = ⅕

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • I really need help plzz
    11·1 answer
  • What could be a reason for isolating a variable in a literal equation
    13·1 answer
  • IS 85 milometers greater or less then 0.85 litters?
    13·1 answer
  • What is the area of the triangle given below
    6·1 answer
  • 816 divided by 2 long division
    8·2 answers
  • During the week of a convention, there were 608 occupied hotel rooms and 342 unoccupied hotel rooms in Lindsey's city. What perc
    14·1 answer
  • the cost to join a yoga studio is $100, plus $25 per month. What is the cost of the first 8 months at the yoga studio ?
    7·1 answer
  • Which number line represents the solution to the inequality 225x + 400 ≥ 2200?
    10·1 answer
  • The equation y = 1/4x represents a proportional relationship. What is the constant of proportionality?​
    5·1 answer
  • 35% is 7 out of what number?
    12·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!