1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
ruslelena [56]
3 years ago
8

Verify that the function u(x, y, z) = log x^2 + y^2 is a solution of the two dimensional Laplace equation u_xx + u_yy = 0 everyw

here, except of course at the origin where f is not defined. Verify that the following functions solve the wave equation, u_tt = u_xx u(x, t) = cos(4x) cos(4t) u(x, t) = f(x - t) + f(x + 1), where f is any differentiable function of one variable.
Mathematics
1 answer:
Daniel [21]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

The function  u(x,y,z)=log ( x^{2} +y^{2}) is indeed a solution of the two dimensional Laplace equation  u_{xx} +u_{yy} =0.

The wave equation  u_{tt} =u_{xx} is satisfied by the function u(x,t)=cos(4x)cos(4t) but not by the function u(x,t)=f(x-t)+f(x+1).

Step-by-step explanation:

To verify that the function  u(x,y,z)=log ( x^{2} +y^{2}) is a solution of the 2D Laplace equation we calculate the second partial derivative with respect to x and then with respect to t.

u_{xx}=\frac{2}{ln(10)}((x^{2} +y^{2})^{-1} -2x^{2} (x^{2} +y^{2})^{-2})

u_{yy}=\frac{2}{ln(10)}((x^{2} +y^{2})^{-1} -2y^{2} (x^{2} +y^{2})^{-2})

then we introduce it in the equation  u_{xx} +u_{yy} =0

we get that  \frac{2}{ln(10)} (\frac{2}{(x^{2}+y^{2}) } - \frac{2}{(x^{2}+y^{2} ) } )=0

To see if the functions 1) u(x,t)=cos(4x)cos(4t) and 2)    u(x,t)=f(x-t)+f(x+1) solve the wave equation we have to calculate the second partial derivative with respect to x and the with respect to t for each function. Then we see if they are equal.

1)  u_{xx}=-16 cos (4x) cos (4t)

   u_{tt}=-16cos(4x)cos(4t)

we see for the above expressions that  u_{tt} =u_{xx}

2) with this function we will have to use the chain rule

 If we call  s=x-t and  w=x+1  then we have that

 u(x,t)=f(x-t)+f(x+1)=f(s)+f(w)

So  \frac{\partial u}{\partial x}=\frac{df}{ds}\frac{\partial s}{\partial x} +\frac{df}{dw} \frac{\partial w}{\partial x}

because we have  \frac{\partial s}{\partial x} =1 and   \frac{\partial w}{\partial x} =1

then  \frac{\partial u}{\partial x} =f'(s)+f'(w)

⇒ \frac{\partial^{2} u }{\partial x^{2} } =\frac{\partial}{\partial x} (f'(s))+ \frac{\partial}{\partial x} (f'(w))

⇒\frac{\partial^{2} u }{ \partial x^{2} } =\frac{d}{ds} (f'(s))\frac{\partial s}{\partial x} +\frac{d}{ds} (f'(w))\frac{\partial w}{\partial x}

⇒ \frac{\partial^{2} u }{ \partial x^{2} } =f''(s)+f''(w)

Regarding the derivatives with respect to time

\frac{\partial u}{\partial t}=\frac{df}{ds} \frac{\partial s}{\partial t}+\frac{df}{dw} \frac{\partial w}{\partial t}=-\frac{df}{ds} =-f'(s)

then  \frac{\partial^{2} u }{\partial t^{2} } =\frac{\partial}{\partial t} (-f'(s))=-\frac{d}{ds} (f'(s))\frac{\partial s}{\partial t} =f''(s)

we see that  \frac{\partial^{2} u }{ \partial x^{2} } =f''(s)+f''(w) \neq f''(s)=\frac{\partial^{2} u }{\partial t^{2} }

u(x,t)=f(x-t)+f(x+1)  doesn´t satisfy the wave equation.

You might be interested in
What is the probability that someone in chicago is stung by a bee
AysviL [449]

Step-by-step explanation:

0.075 % is the probability of that

6 0
2 years ago
Sonic rolls up a slope at 9.4 m/s. after 3.0 he is rolling back down ay 7.4 m/s. how far up the hill is he at this time?
vovikov84 [41]
U= 9.4m/s
v= -7.4m/s (Negative sign because it is in the opposite direction as he is rolling back)
t= ?
s= ?
a= ?
Now, a= v-u/t
= -7.4-9.4÷3
=-5.6
By the second equation of motion.
s= ut+1÷2at*2 ( *2 is the power)
s= 9.4×3+1÷2×-5.6×3*2
= 28.2 +(-25.2)
=3
Therefore s or the distance travelled is 3m.


6 0
2 years ago
Find the slope of the<br> line perpendicular to<br> 3x + 4y = 16
BartSMP [9]

Answer:

The answer is 16, I am pretty sure.

Step-by-step explanation:

I am soo sorry if it is wrong.

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Use Euler's formula to find the missing number.
irakobra [83]
The answer is C 16 I believe
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What is 35/6 in simplest form
Len [333]
Its already in simplest form u cant simplify it hope this helps!!

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • As a​ follow-up to a report on gas​ consumption, a consumer group conducted a study of SUV owners to estimate the mean mileage f
    5·1 answer
  • What is the remainder of -x^3-x^2+3 / x+3
    12·1 answer
  • Find the value of x in the parallelogram
    9·1 answer
  • Clara writes the following proof for the theorem:if the diagonals of a quadrilateral bisect each other
    12·2 answers
  • Find three consecutive positive integers such that the product of the first and​ third, minus the​ second, is 1 more than 7 time
    15·1 answer
  • H(x)=3x-1; Find h(-5)
    5·1 answer
  • Find the surface area of the cylinder to the nearest whole number. The figure is not drawn to
    10·1 answer
  • A function has f''(x) = 10 and has f'(4) = 0 and f(2) = 4. Find f(x)
    14·1 answer
  • Multiply<br> 7x(x^- x+2)
    11·1 answer
  • I neeeeedd help brainliest going to first correct answer
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!