Industrialization went hand in hand with democratic institutions and respect for private property. To the extent working people constituted a unified block of voters, they had to be listened to.
<span>Now, let me ask you a question: What does your question really ask? That is to say, what do you mean by "the major industrial nations of the west"? In what way are they different from the "working people" who live in them? Or, do you think that all John D. Rockefeller did was sit around all day and let money flow into his pocket like honey from a pot? Guys like E.H. Harriman worked very, very hard. So, does your question really make any sense?</span>
hey fail to understand the past and current ecology of the place, its wildlife, politics and people. And this can lead to failure. Studies have shown, for instance, that conservation groups often fail to look into past patterns of human population densities in and around proposed protected area
Answer:
b) when they are unhappy and their prospects seem brighter elsewhere
Explanation:
<u>Those who have been unhappy for some time usually decide to separate and divorce, but this is not the only factor.</u><u> Usually what follows is that there is an available alternative option that seems more fortunate, kind of the reward (like saving money, obtaining a degree, saving contacts with someone who doesn't support their decision to stay in that union, etc.) </u>
The author says that the bottom line is not just unhappiness, <u>but that in some way the prospect of the divorce is in favor of some other option and elsewhere. </u>
they traded, same gods, and hierogylphs (meroitic glyphs).
Good luck, please vote me brainliest!
