1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
natta225 [31]
4 years ago
15

Assume that the U.S. inflation rate is lower than the New Zealand inflation rate. This will cause U.S. consumers to ____ their i

mports from New Zealand and New Zealand consumers to ____ their imports from the U.S. According to purchasing power parity (PPP), this will result in a(n) ____ of the New Zealand dollar (NZ$).
Social Studies
1 answer:
Misha Larkins [42]4 years ago
8 0

Hello there!

The aswers is: This will cause U.S. consumers to <u>increase</u> their imports from New Zealand and New Zealand consumers to <u>reduce</u> their imports from the U.S. According to purchasing power parity (PPP), whis will result in an <u>appreciation</u> of the New Zealand dollar (NZ$).

Explanation:

The inflation rate refers to an overall increase in the Customer Price Index (CPI), a weighted average for different goods. If this the U.S. inflation rate is lower than the New Zealand inflation rate, the U.S. will have the opportunity to import more products and/or goods as they rate means economic certainty, and New Zealand as being more affected, their imports will decrease.

You might be interested in
Sumerian women could be important religious leaders.
anastassius [24]

Answer:

true

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
When the U.S. government determined the prices of solar panels imported from China were artificially low due to illegal subsidie
WINSTONCH [101]

Answer:

tariff

Explanation:

6 0
4 years ago
How has the government tried to end wage discrimination?
Tasya [4]

Answer:

Explanation:

The government has tried to end wage discrimination since back in 2016 when the state lawmakers introduced at least 180 bills across the country aimed at shrinking the pay gap. Seven were enacted, dozens are pending and nearly 50 either failed or were vetoed. A year prior, 76 equal pay-related bills were introduced in 33 states. And it’s not just progressive states like California taking the wage gap seriously. Louisiana, North Dakota and Utah are just three examples of Republican states advancing such legislation, said Emily Martin, a legal expert on equal pay. In North Dakota, for instance, a bill passed in 2015 strengthening employer's salary reporting requirements. The state, which overwhelmingly voted for Trump in the 2016 election, proves the issue of pay equity is still being addressed in conservative areas. “I’m glad that states are really focusing on equal pay and exploring new policy solutions to ensure women are paid equally to men, in part because federal policy-making is at best stalled on this issue, and at worst, we might be seeing rollbacks in coming years,” Martin, who serves as general counsel and vice president for workplace justice at the National Women’s Law Center, told NBC News.While equal pay laws passed by Congress include the Equal Pay Act passed of 1963, states are offering creative solutions to expand protections for women and close federal loopholes. Don't Ask, Don't Tell

Bills that prohibit employers from requiring job applicants to reveal their salary history can prevent pay discrimination from following a woman throughout her career. In 2016, Massachusetts enacted first-of-its-kind legislation forbidding employers from inquiring about salary history. Since then, California has followed suit and nearly 20 states have introduced similar measures. “If your new employer is setting how much you make based on how much you made at your last job, given that women tend to be paid less than men, it has the effect of replicating those wage disparities through a woman’s career as she shifts from job to job,” Martin said. “We’ve seen a lot of interest in other states in replicating [Massachusetts’s law].” California, Delaware, Maryland and Connecticut are among the states in 2016 that strengthened laws prohibiting bosses from retaliating against employees who discuss their wages with coworkers. As of 2017, 17 states had "pay secrecy" laws on the books, and some are looking to strengthen existing law. But several states, including Arizona, continue to allow such practices from employers. “You can’t challenge pay discrimination if you don’t know you’re being paid less than a male coworker, but a lot of employers either have formal policies prohibiting employees from talking to each other about wages or strong implicit disapproval for employees talking to each other about wages,” Martin said. Delaware Gov. Jack Markell signed H.B. 314 into law in 2016, making it illegal for employers to require employees to sign a document waiving the right to discuss salaries with other workers. Making Fewer Businesses Exempt

Several states have equal pay protections that don’t apply to smaller businesses or to workers in the private sector, where the wage gap tends to be more pronounced due to a less transparent pay structure. Five states— Utah, Texas, South Carolina, North Carolina and Georgia — exempt small businesses from enforcing equal pay protections, while Louisiana's laws only apply to public workers.

In March, Nebraska amended its equal pay protections to encompass businesses that employ at least two workers per day. Previously, the law applied to businesses with more than 15 workers. “The bottom line is line is protections need to cover everyone and they need to be strong and robust,” Kate Nielson, the state policy analyst for the American Association of University Women, told NBC News. But Will State Legislation Be Enough?

On Equal Pay D

6 0
3 years ago
In order to stall a vote on a particular bill, a senator speaks at the Senate for a prolonged period. This political tactic is k
tester [92]

Answer:

Option C: FILIBUSTERING

Explanation:

filibustering is simply an a formal and public act or way of preventing a bill to be voted on in the senate debate. It usually entails an active serving senator taking the floor for debate and talks as long as he can, for, as long as a senator has the floor, the bill in question cannot be voted on.

It is only used in the senate due to the fact that the senate does not share a time limit on how long the bill can be debated on.

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The sociologist, daniel chirot, argues that the recent worldwide increase in ethnic hostilities is a consequence of "retribaliza
Alexeev081 [22]

Answer:

Daniel Chirot is a Sociologist and Professor of International Studies at the University of Washington, Seattle.

He argued that the recent worldwide increase in ethnic hostilities is a consequence of retribalization.

His context of retribalization means the tendency for groups to seek meaning and belongin in an ethnic group. There are macro and micro explanations for terrorism.

8 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • How jelly beans are made?
    13·1 answer
  • President Theodore Roosevelt's commitment to the proverb, "Speak softly and carry a big stick;
    15·1 answer
  • Which action is an example of an implied power of Congress?
    10·2 answers
  • Thomson claims that if a trolley driver refuses to steer the runaway trolley onto a side track, and because of this the trolley
    10·1 answer
  • Janet means well when she tells her daughter, "Please don’t ever date a boy with a tattoo. People with tattoos are dangerous. A
    7·1 answer
  • Which of the following is an important aspect of symbolic interactionism?
    10·1 answer
  • Why did the Union not want Confederates to run in the U.S Government?
    9·1 answer
  • What is Bheja and Describe these customs briefly​
    10·1 answer
  • How does addiction to social media affect the social skills of the youth?​
    15·1 answer
  • What are positive psychology scientists and practitioners committed to studying and promoting?
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!