Answer:
false
Explanation:
because some people pass on and it's not possible for humans to increase every decade
Answer:
No, I don't reckon that water is alive. I don't think that it is "dead" either. It simply just... exists. However, it DOES hold life within it. But the water itself is not alive, because for something to be considered "alive", it must meet the requirements of responding to stimuli, reproducing and growing, and must be dependent on its environment. Water itself cannot be dependent on an environment, because it IS an environment.
This is just my opinion though :)
1) Scientists believe that the ancient ancestors of all animals were <span>single-celled eukaryotes that sometimes grew in colonies.
</span>Eukaryotic cells have membrane-bound organelles such asmitochondria<span> and the Golgi apparatus.
</span>The best answer is :
<span>B) single-celled eukaryotes that sometimes grew in colonies</span>
For this problem, the most probable and the most likely answer for this would be the second option which is cells.
When viewing, not just corks, but other things under a microscope, may it be a home-made one or of something in value or a technologically advanced microscope, small compartments would always be visible under these lenses and they are cells. Some might look like boxes but they are cells. These cells might come in many sizes, but they will always be cells. Cells are everywhere.
Dunkleosteus is an extinct genus of arthrodire placoderm fish that existed during the Late Dev Devonian period, about 360-380 million years ago.