Answer:
$0 and $12,750
Explanation:
To check deductions for 2019 and 2020, we need to check total expenses:
Total Expenses = $85,000 + $30,000 + $12,500
= $127,500
Since it has a 60 month deferral and amortization period, we need to check for each month. Therefore we have:
=Total expenses / 60months
= $127,500 ÷ 60 months
= $2,125
Therefore, in 2019 there's no benefit or deduction since all expenditures are made.
To get the 2020 the deduction we use:
= Monthly amortization or defferal cost * number of months
= $2,125 × 6 months
= $12,750
The 6 months is calculated assuming books are closed on December 31. It is from July 1 to December 31.
Answer:
9.63%
Explanation:
Calculation of Mutual Fund rate of return that the investor receive on the fund last year
Using this formula
Rate=(Fund's NAV -NAV per share +Income distributions+ Capital gain distributions )
Let plug in the formula
Where:
Fund's NAV =$19.14
NAV per share=$19.00
Income distributions=.57
Capital gain distributions =1.12
Hence
Rate =($19.14 - 19.00 + .57 + 1.12) / $19.00
=1.83/$19.00
=0.0963×100
Rate = 9.63%
Therefore without considering taxes and transactions costs, the rate of return that the investor receive on the fund last year will be 9.63%
Based on the percentage of readers who own a particular make of the car and the random sample, we can infer that there is sufficient evidence at a 0.02 level to support the executive claim.
<h3>What is the evidence to support the executive's claim?</h3>
The hypothesis is:
Null hypothesis : P = 0.55
Alternate hypothesis : P ≠ 0.55
We then need to find the test statistic:
= (Probability found by marketing executive - Probability from publisher) / √( (Probability from publisher x (1 - Probability from publisher))/ number of people sampled
= (0.46 - 0.55) / √(( 0.55 x ( 1 - 0.55)) / 200
= -2.56
Using this z value as the test statistic, perform a two-tailed test to show:
= P( Z < -2.56) + P(Z > 2.56)
= 0.0052 + 0.0052
= 0.0104
The p-value is 0.0104 which is less than the significance level of 0.02. This means that we reject the null hypothesis.
The Marketing executive was correct.
Find out more on the null and alternate hypothesis at brainly.com/question/25263462
#SPJ1
Answer:
a. Accounted for prospectively
Explanation:
Warranty cost is an expense i.e. to be incurred for the repair or replacement of the goods comes under the warranty given by the company.
Here if there is a change in the rate i.e. used for determining the warranty cost so it would be accounted in prospectively manner i.e. it would be changed in the current period and also the amount should be estimated or predicted
Hence, the correct option is a.
Answer
The answer and procedures of the exercise are attached in the following archives.
Step-by-step explanation:
You will find the procedures, formulas or necessary explanations in the archive attached below. If you have any question ask and I will aclare your doubts kindly.
