The correct answer is A. It can be more responsive to the interests of citizens.
Explanation
Direct democracy is a form of government in which all members of a community/country/state actively participate in all decisions made there. On the other hand, there is indirect democracy, the evolution of direct democracy, in it, the decisions depend on a group of representatives elected by citizens, this modality of democracy has been adopted in most modern states.
Direct democracy has advantages over indirect democracy because it better responds to the interests of citizens as each of them will actively participate in the government, thus allowing decisions to be made and ensuring that their interests are taken into account. On the other hand, in indirect democracy, once you elect your representative, you have no direct control over the decisions he makes, regardless of whether they go against your interests. Therefore, the correct answer is A. It can be more responsive to the interests of citizens.
Answer:
interperpretig the law, managing the law. I believe these are the only two things they are responsiable for.
Explanation:
Answer:Same lol, it was good, thanks for asking :P
Explanation:
Single stories negatively relate to U.S. history because it caused a lot of hate to be given toward a specific person or group of people just because someone made up a fake story. Single stories have always been a problem not just now but all throughout history.
If we consider the speech of Barack Obama, when he leaves the presidency of the United States of America, we will believe that there is reason to believe that democracy is threatened.
According to Obama, there are currently 3 threats to democracy, the first of which are forces such as terrorism, increased inequality and demographic changes that threaten the country's security, solidarity and prosperity, but these same forces also threaten democracy
. if opportunities are not created for all people in the country, division and dissatisfaction will only become clearer in the coming years, threatening democracy.
Obama also highlighted a second threat, which is the racial issue. "So if we're going to be serious about the racial issue, then we need to maintain anti-discrimination laws - in hiring, housing, education, and the criminal justice system." Said the former president who pointed out that only laws will not suffice to resolve the racial issue. "Hearts must change. It will not be a change overnight." Social attitudes sometimes take generations to change".
Obama also mentioned a third threat to democracy, which is when a group of similar people joins a bubble, be it a community, a church, a social network or a college, and that group brings together similar people with the same political vision. One person never questions the other's hypotheses.
