The budget constrain is how much of each good can Joe's buy and it's given by:
Income = P_f * Q_f +P_s * Q_s
P_f = Price_of_Food
Q_f = Quantity_of_Food
P_s = Price_of_Shelter
Q_s = Quantity_of_Shelter
In case a):
300 = 5*Q_f(a) + 100*Q_s
in case b):
300 = 10*Q_f(b) + 100*Q_s
To draw each line, you can make a graphic in which the x axis is Q_s and y axis is Q_f
set Q_f = 0 and solve for Q_s which gives => Q_s = 3 so, in the x axis the line will start in Q_s = 3
the same, and solve for Q_f and it'll give =>
Q_f(a) = 60
Q_f(b) = 30
So, from the start in x axis in Q_s = 3 you draw the line (a) to the y axis Q_f(a) = 60 and you draw the line (b) to the y axis Q_f(b) = 30
To get the oportunity cost you have to divide the cost of what is given up (food) by what is gained (shelter).
Oportunity_Cost_Food(a) = 5/100 = 0.05
Oportunity_Cost_Food(b) = 10/100 = 0.10
As you can see, the oportunity cost of food increase
Answer:
The answer to this question is (c) Labour, Labour intensive
In the 2-factor, 2-good Heckscher-Ohlin model, the country with a relative abundance of labour will have a production possibility frontier that is biased toward production of the labour intensive good
Explanation:
The Heckscher-Ohlin model is an economic theory that proposes that countries export what they can most efficiently and plentifully produce.
The model emphasizes the export of goods requiring factors of production that a country has in abundance. It also emphasizes the import of goods that a nation cannot produce as efficiently. It takes the position that countries should ideally export materials and resources of which they have an excess, while proportionately importing those resources they need.
Therefore in regard to the question above,
In the 2-factor, 2-good Heckscher-Ohlin model, the country with a relative abundance of labour will have a production possibility frontier that is biased toward production of the labour intensive good
Hence the answer is the third option, Labour, Labour intensive
Answer:
d) It is a use of cash, and will be shown in the investing section as a subtraction.
Explanation:
The plant improvements will result in cash outflow and is to be considered as an investing activity and not financing activity. It is not a source of cash. So, this option is incorrect.
There will be cash outflows when a company makes plant improvements. It is reported under the investing activity and not under financing activity. So, this option is incorrect.
There will be cash usage when their plant improvements. It is not a source of cash which does not result in cash inflows. So, this option is incorrect.
<u>A social goal of any economic system:</u>
All economic systems' broad goals saw as key to the U.S. economy are soundness, security, economic freedom, equity, economic growth, efficiency, and full employment.
Accomplishing these objectives is troublesome in light of the fact that—despite the fact that the objectives supplement each other now and again—by and large, there are exchange offs to confront. To keep up a solid economy, the national government looks to achieve three approach objectives: stable costs, full business, and financial development.
Notwithstanding these three arrangement objectives, the central government has different destinations to keep up the sound financial strategy. Monetary objectives are not in every case commonly perfect; the expense of tending to a specific objective or set of objectives is having fewer assets to focus on the rest of the objectives.
Answer and Explanation:
1.
Net Operating loss carryback Amount Rate of Tax Tax Recorded as
Carried back - 2014 $0.0 30% $0.0
Carried back - 2015 $0.0 30% $0.0
Carried back - 2016 $42,000 35% $14,700.0
Carried back - 2017 $8,000.0 40% $3,200.0
Total Carryback $50,000.0 $17,900.0
Journal Entries - Cabot Company
Date Particulars Debit Credit
31-Dec-18 Receivables - Income Tax Refund $17,900
To Income tax benefit - Net Operating Loss $17,900
2. Cabot's net loss for 2018 = -$50,000 + $17,900
= ($32,100)
